fkie_cve-2023-53618
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-07 16:15
Modified
2025-10-08 19:38
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump
[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().
That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.
[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:
BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17
Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it's a reloc tree for quota tree.
But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won't be shared with other trees.
Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).
Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().
[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump\n\n[BUG]\nSyzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside\nprepare_to_merge().\n\nThat ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its\nsubvolume tree.\n\n[CAUSE]\nAfter more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:\n\n BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17\n\nNote the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,\nQUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it\u0027s a reloc tree for quota tree.\n\nBut reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume\ntrees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc\ntree since those tree blocks won\u0027t be shared with other trees.\n\nOnly subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they\nhave BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).\n\nThus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted\non-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().\n\n[FIX]\nBesides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to\ncheck such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-53618",
"lastModified": "2025-10-08T19:38:32.610",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-10-07T16:15:44.297",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/314135b7bae9618a317874ae195272682cf2d5d4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ae93b316ca4b8b3c33798ef1d210355f2fb9318"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ebcd021c92b8e4b904552e4d87283032100796d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84256e00eeca73c529fc6196e478cc89b8098157"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…