fkie_cve-2023-53531
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-01 12:15
Modified
2025-10-02 19:11
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
null_blk: fix poll request timeout handling
When doing io_uring benchmark on /dev/nullb0, it's easy to crash the
kernel if poll requests timeout triggered, as reported by David. [1]
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_timeout_work
RIP: 0010:null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91
Call Trace:
? null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91
blk_mq_handle_expired+0x31/0x4b
bt_iter+0x68/0x84
? bt_tags_iter+0x81/0x81
__sbitmap_for_each_set.constprop.0+0xb0/0xf2
? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf
bt_for_each+0x46/0x64
? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf
? percpu_ref_get_many+0xc/0x2a
blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x14d/0x18e
blk_mq_timeout_work+0x95/0x127
process_one_work+0x185/0x263
worker_thread+0x1b5/0x227
This is indeed a race problem between null_timeout_rq() and null_poll().
null_poll() null_timeout_rq()
spin_lock(&nq->poll_lock)
list_splice_init(&nq->poll_list, &list)
spin_unlock(&nq->poll_lock)
while (!list_empty(&list))
req = list_first_entry()
list_del_init()
...
blk_mq_add_to_batch()
// req->rq_next = NULL
spin_lock(&nq->poll_lock)
// rq->queuelist->next == NULL
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist)
spin_unlock(&nq->poll_lock)
Fix these problems by setting requests state to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE under
nq->poll_lock protection, in which null_timeout_rq() can safely detect
this race and early return.
Note this patch just fix the kernel panic when request timeout happen.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3893581.1691785261@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnull_blk: fix poll request timeout handling\n\nWhen doing io_uring benchmark on /dev/nullb0, it\u0027s easy to crash the\nkernel if poll requests timeout triggered, as reported by David. [1]\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\nWorkqueue: kblockd blk_mq_timeout_work\nRIP: 0010:null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91\nCall Trace:\n ? null_timeout_rq+0x4e/0x91\n blk_mq_handle_expired+0x31/0x4b\n bt_iter+0x68/0x84\n ? bt_tags_iter+0x81/0x81\n __sbitmap_for_each_set.constprop.0+0xb0/0xf2\n ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf\n bt_for_each+0x46/0x64\n ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xf/0xf\n ? percpu_ref_get_many+0xc/0x2a\n blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x14d/0x18e\n blk_mq_timeout_work+0x95/0x127\n process_one_work+0x185/0x263\n worker_thread+0x1b5/0x227\n\nThis is indeed a race problem between null_timeout_rq() and null_poll().\n\nnull_poll()\t\t\t\tnull_timeout_rq()\n spin_lock(\u0026nq-\u003epoll_lock)\n list_splice_init(\u0026nq-\u003epoll_list, \u0026list)\n spin_unlock(\u0026nq-\u003epoll_lock)\n\n while (!list_empty(\u0026list))\n req = list_first_entry()\n list_del_init()\n ...\n blk_mq_add_to_batch()\n // req-\u003erq_next = NULL\n\t\t\t\t\tspin_lock(\u0026nq-\u003epoll_lock)\n\n\t\t\t\t\t// rq-\u003equeuelist-\u003enext == NULL\n\t\t\t\t\tlist_del_init(\u0026rq-\u003equeuelist)\n\n\t\t\t\t\tspin_unlock(\u0026nq-\u003epoll_lock)\n\nFix these problems by setting requests state to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE under\nnq-\u003epoll_lock protection, in which null_timeout_rq() can safely detect\nthis race and early return.\n\nNote this patch just fix the kernel panic when request timeout happen.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3893581.1691785261@warthog.procyon.org.uk/" } ], "id": "CVE-2023-53531", "lastModified": "2025-10-02T19:11:46.753", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-10-01T12:15:57.843", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a26e45edb4690d58406178b5a9ea4c6dcf2c105" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0b4a0666beacfe8add9c71d8922475541dbae73" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7cb2e709f2927cc3c76781df3e45de2381b3b9d" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…