fkie_cve-2023-53511
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-01 12:15
Modified
2025-10-02 19:11
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: fix fget leak when fs don't support nowait buffered read Heming reported a BUG when using io_uring doing link-cp on ocfs2. [1] Do the following steps can reproduce this BUG: mount -t ocfs2 /dev/vdc /mnt/ocfs2 cp testfile /mnt/ocfs2/ ./link-cp /mnt/ocfs2/testfile /mnt/ocfs2/testfile.1 umount /mnt/ocfs2 Then umount will fail, and it outputs: umount: /mnt/ocfs2: target is busy. While tracing umount, it blames mnt_get_count() not return as expected. Do a deep investigation for fget()/fput() on related code flow, I've finally found that fget() leaks since ocfs2 doesn't support nowait buffered read. io_issue_sqe |-io_assign_file // do fget() first |-io_read |-io_iter_do_read |-ocfs2_file_read_iter // return -EOPNOTSUPP |-kiocb_done |-io_rw_done |-__io_complete_rw_common // set REQ_F_REISSUE |-io_resubmit_prep |-io_req_prep_async // override req->file, leak happens This was introduced by commit a196c78b5443 in v5.18. Fix it by don't re-assign req->file if it has already been assigned. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/ab580a75-91c8-d68a-3455-40361be1bfa8@linux.alibaba.com/T/#t
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nio_uring: fix fget leak when fs don\u0027t support nowait buffered read\n\nHeming reported a BUG when using io_uring doing link-cp on ocfs2. [1]\n\nDo the following steps can reproduce this BUG:\nmount -t ocfs2 /dev/vdc /mnt/ocfs2\ncp testfile /mnt/ocfs2/\n./link-cp /mnt/ocfs2/testfile /mnt/ocfs2/testfile.1\numount /mnt/ocfs2\n\nThen umount will fail, and it outputs:\numount: /mnt/ocfs2: target is busy.\n\nWhile tracing umount, it blames mnt_get_count() not return as expected.\nDo a deep investigation for fget()/fput() on related code flow, I\u0027ve\nfinally found that fget() leaks since ocfs2 doesn\u0027t support nowait\nbuffered read.\n\nio_issue_sqe\n|-io_assign_file  // do fget() first\n  |-io_read\n  |-io_iter_do_read\n    |-ocfs2_file_read_iter  // return -EOPNOTSUPP\n  |-kiocb_done\n    |-io_rw_done\n      |-__io_complete_rw_common  // set REQ_F_REISSUE\n    |-io_resubmit_prep\n      |-io_req_prep_async  // override req-\u003efile, leak happens\n\nThis was introduced by commit a196c78b5443 in v5.18. Fix it by don\u0027t\nre-assign req-\u003efile if it has already been assigned.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/ab580a75-91c8-d68a-3455-40361be1bfa8@linux.alibaba.com/T/#t"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-53511",
  "lastModified": "2025-10-02T19:11:46.753",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-10-01T12:15:55.030",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10fb2e16ee6ffaf1716b9e90d007e6b300bfa457"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/54aa7f2330b82884f4a1afce0220add6e8312f8b"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/75a499fc9d66a32271e2b3e4ca71156e8ad3b484"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…