fkie_cve-2023-53431
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-09-18 16:15
Modified
2025-10-01 08:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ses: Handle enclosure with just a primary component gracefully This reverts commit 3fe97ff3d949 ("scsi: ses: Don't attach if enclosure has no components") and introduces proper handling of case where there are no detected secondary components, but primary component (enumerated in num_enclosures) does exist. That fix was originally proposed by Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>. Completely ignoring devices that have one primary enclosure and no secondary one results in ses_intf_add() bailing completely scsi 2:0:0:254: enclosure has no enumerated components scsi 2:0:0:254: Failed to bind enclosure -12ven in valid configurations such even on valid configurations with 1 primary and 0 secondary enclosures as below: # sg_ses /dev/sg0 3PARdata SES 3321 Supported diagnostic pages: Supported Diagnostic Pages [sdp] [0x0] Configuration (SES) [cf] [0x1] Short Enclosure Status (SES) [ses] [0x8] # sg_ses -p cf /dev/sg0 3PARdata SES 3321 Configuration diagnostic page: number of secondary subenclosures: 0 generation code: 0x0 enclosure descriptor list Subenclosure identifier: 0 [primary] relative ES process id: 0, number of ES processes: 1 number of type descriptor headers: 1 enclosure logical identifier (hex): 20000002ac02068d enclosure vendor: 3PARdata product: VV rev: 3321 type descriptor header and text list Element type: Unspecified, subenclosure id: 0 number of possible elements: 1 The changelog for the original fix follows ===== We can get a crash when disconnecting the iSCSI session, the call trace like this: [ffff00002a00fb70] kfree at ffff00000830e224 [ffff00002a00fba0] ses_intf_remove at ffff000001f200e4 [ffff00002a00fbd0] device_del at ffff0000086b6a98 [ffff00002a00fc50] device_unregister at ffff0000086b6d58 [ffff00002a00fc70] __scsi_remove_device at ffff00000870608c [ffff00002a00fca0] scsi_remove_device at ffff000008706134 [ffff00002a00fcc0] __scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087062e4 [ffff00002a00fd10] scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087064c0 [ffff00002a00fd70] __iscsi_unbind_session at ffff000001c872c4 [ffff00002a00fdb0] process_one_work at ffff00000810f35c [ffff00002a00fe00] worker_thread at ffff00000810f648 [ffff00002a00fe70] kthread at ffff000008116e98 In ses_intf_add, components count could be 0, and kcalloc 0 size scomp, but not saved in edev->component[i].scratch In this situation, edev->component[0].scratch is an invalid pointer, when kfree it in ses_intf_remove_enclosure, a crash like above would happen The call trace also could be other random cases when kfree cannot catch the invalid pointer We should not use edev->component[] array when the components count is 0 We also need check index when use edev->component[] array in ses_enclosure_data_process =====
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ses: Handle enclosure with just a primary component gracefully\n\nThis reverts commit 3fe97ff3d949 (\"scsi: ses: Don\u0027t attach if enclosure\nhas no components\") and introduces proper handling of case where there are\nno detected secondary components, but primary component (enumerated in\nnum_enclosures) does exist. That fix was originally proposed by Ding Hui\n\u003cdinghui@sangfor.com.cn\u003e.\n\nCompletely ignoring devices that have one primary enclosure and no\nsecondary one results in ses_intf_add() bailing completely\n\n\tscsi 2:0:0:254: enclosure has no enumerated components\n        scsi 2:0:0:254: Failed to bind enclosure -12ven in valid configurations such\n\neven on valid configurations with 1 primary and 0 secondary enclosures as\nbelow:\n\n\t# sg_ses /dev/sg0\n\t  3PARdata  SES               3321\n\tSupported diagnostic pages:\n\t  Supported Diagnostic Pages [sdp] [0x0]\n\t  Configuration (SES) [cf] [0x1]\n\t  Short Enclosure Status (SES) [ses] [0x8]\n\t# sg_ses -p cf /dev/sg0\n\t  3PARdata  SES               3321\n\tConfiguration diagnostic page:\n\t  number of secondary subenclosures: 0\n\t  generation code: 0x0\n\t  enclosure descriptor list\n\t    Subenclosure identifier: 0 [primary]\n\t      relative ES process id: 0, number of ES processes: 1\n\t      number of type descriptor headers: 1\n\t      enclosure logical identifier (hex): 20000002ac02068d\n\t      enclosure vendor: 3PARdata  product: VV                rev: 3321\n\t  type descriptor header and text list\n\t    Element type: Unspecified, subenclosure id: 0\n\t      number of possible elements: 1\n\nThe changelog for the original fix follows\n\n=====\nWe can get a crash when disconnecting the iSCSI session,\nthe call trace like this:\n\n  [ffff00002a00fb70] kfree at ffff00000830e224\n  [ffff00002a00fba0] ses_intf_remove at ffff000001f200e4\n  [ffff00002a00fbd0] device_del at ffff0000086b6a98\n  [ffff00002a00fc50] device_unregister at ffff0000086b6d58\n  [ffff00002a00fc70] __scsi_remove_device at ffff00000870608c\n  [ffff00002a00fca0] scsi_remove_device at ffff000008706134\n  [ffff00002a00fcc0] __scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087062e4\n  [ffff00002a00fd10] scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087064c0\n  [ffff00002a00fd70] __iscsi_unbind_session at ffff000001c872c4\n  [ffff00002a00fdb0] process_one_work at ffff00000810f35c\n  [ffff00002a00fe00] worker_thread at ffff00000810f648\n  [ffff00002a00fe70] kthread at ffff000008116e98\n\nIn ses_intf_add, components count could be 0, and kcalloc 0 size scomp,\nbut not saved in edev-\u003ecomponent[i].scratch\n\nIn this situation, edev-\u003ecomponent[0].scratch is an invalid pointer,\nwhen kfree it in ses_intf_remove_enclosure, a crash like above would happen\nThe call trace also could be other random cases when kfree cannot catch\nthe invalid pointer\n\nWe should not use edev-\u003ecomponent[] array when the components count is 0\nWe also need check index when use edev-\u003ecomponent[] array in\nses_enclosure_data_process\n====="
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2023-53431",
  "lastModified": "2025-10-01T08:15:30.747",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-09-18T16:15:47.070",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05143d90ac90b7abc6692285895a1ef460e008ee"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/110d425cdfb15006f3c4fde5264e786a247b6b36"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/176d7345b89ced72020a313bfa4e7f345d1c3aed"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e7c498c3713b09bef20c76c7319555637e8bbd5"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8e22b7a1694bb8d025ea636816472739d859145"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eabc4872f172ecb8dd8536bc366a51868154a450"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8e702c54413eee2d8f94f61d18adadac7c87e87"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…