fkie_cve-2023-53419
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-09-18 16:15
Modified
2025-09-19 16:00
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() ->exp_tasks access
For kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can
result in a NULL-pointer dereference:
CPU1 CPU2
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore rcu_print_task_exp_stall
if (special.b.blocked) READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks) != NULL
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node
np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp)
if (&t->rcu_node_entry == rnp->exp_tasks)
WRITE_ONCE(rnp->exp_tasks, np)
....
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node
t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry)
(if rnp->exp_tasks is NULL, this
will dereference a NULL pointer)
The problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks
field without holding the rcu_node structure's ->lock and CPU2 did
not observe CPU1's change to rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks in time.
Therefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure's->exp_tasks pointer to NULL,
then CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer.
This commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure's ->lock while
accessing that structure's->exp_tasks field.
[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrcu: Protect rcu_print_task_exp_stall() -\u003eexp_tasks access\n\nFor kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, the following scenario can\nresult in a NULL-pointer dereference:\n\n CPU1 CPU2\nrcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore rcu_print_task_exp_stall\n if (special.b.blocked) READ_ONCE(rnp-\u003eexp_tasks) != NULL\n raw_spin_lock_rcu_node\n np = rcu_next_node_entry(t, rnp)\n if (\u0026t-\u003ercu_node_entry == rnp-\u003eexp_tasks)\n WRITE_ONCE(rnp-\u003eexp_tasks, np)\n ....\n raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node\n raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node\n t = list_entry(rnp-\u003eexp_tasks-\u003eprev,\n struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry)\n (if rnp-\u003eexp_tasks is NULL, this\n will dereference a NULL pointer)\n\nThe problem is that CPU2 accesses the rcu_node structure\u0027s-\u003eexp_tasks\nfield without holding the rcu_node structure\u0027s -\u003elock and CPU2 did\nnot observe CPU1\u0027s change to rcu_node structure\u0027s -\u003eexp_tasks in time.\nTherefore, if CPU1 sets rcu_node structure\u0027s-\u003eexp_tasks pointer to NULL,\nthen CPU2 might dereference that NULL pointer.\n\nThis commit therefore holds the rcu_node structure\u0027s -\u003elock while\naccessing that structure\u0027s-\u003eexp_tasks field.\n\n[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]" } ], "id": "CVE-2023-53419", "lastModified": "2025-09-19T16:00:27.847", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-09-18T16:15:45.650", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bc0ae94ef1f9ed322d8ee439de3239ea3632ab2" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c1566bca3f8349f12b75d0a2d5e4a20ad6262ec" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7d21b8585894e6fff973f6ddae42f02b13f600f" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0a8c0e31a09ec1efd53079083e2a677956b4d91" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e30a55e98ae6c44253d8b129efefd5da5bc6e3bc" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…