fkie_cve-2023-52928
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-03-27 17:15
Modified
2025-10-29 17:14
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Skip invalid kfunc call in backtrack_insn
The verifier skips invalid kfunc call in check_kfunc_call(), which
would be captured in fixup_kfunc_call() if such insn is not eliminated
by dead code elimination. However, this can lead to the following
warning in backtrack_insn(), also see [1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------
verifier backtracking bug
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756
__mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065
mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165
adjust_reg_min_max_vals kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715
check_alu_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928
do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [inline]
do_check_common kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289
[...]
So make backtracking conservative with this by returning ENOTSUPP.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaXNceR8ZjkLG=dT3P=4A8SBsg0Z5h5PWLryF5=ghKq=g@mail.gmail.com/
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.2 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.2 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.2 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.2 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9160197A-606C-4AAF-91FD-A61425E3EEAE",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.93",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "535D03F4-DA02-49FE-934E-668827E6407B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FF501633-2F44-4913-A8EE-B021929F49F6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2BDA597B-CAC1-4DF0-86F0-42E142C654E9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "725C78C9-12CE-406F-ABE8-0813A01D66E8",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A127C155-689C-4F67-B146-44A57F4BFD85",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Skip invalid kfunc call in backtrack_insn\n\nThe verifier skips invalid kfunc call in check_kfunc_call(), which\nwould be captured in fixup_kfunc_call() if such insn is not eliminated\nby dead code elimination. However, this can lead to the following\nwarning in backtrack_insn(), also see [1]:\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n verifier backtracking bug\n WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn\n kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756\n\t__mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065\n\tmark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165\n\tadjust_reg_min_max_vals kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715\n\tcheck_alu_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928\n\tdo_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [inline]\n\tdo_check_common kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289\n [...]\n\nSo make backtracking conservative with this by returning ENOTSUPP.\n\n [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaXNceR8ZjkLG=dT3P=4A8SBsg0Z5h5PWLryF5=ghKq=g@mail.gmail.com/"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bpf: Omite llamada kfunc no v\u00e1lida en backtrack_insn El verificador omite llamada kfunc no v\u00e1lida en check_kfunc_call(), que se capturar\u00eda en fixup_kfunc_call() si dicha insn no se elimina mediante la eliminaci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo muerto. Sin embargo, esto puede generar la siguiente advertencia en backtrack_insn(), vea tambi\u00e9n [1]: ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ error de retroceso del verificador ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 6 PID: 8646 en kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 backtrack_insn kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2756 __mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3065 mark_chain_precision kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3165 adjust_reg_min_max_vals kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10715 check_alu_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10928 do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13821 [en l\u00ednea] do_check_common kernel/bpf/verifier.c:16289 [...] As\u00ed que haga que el retroceso sea conservador con esto devolviendo ENOTSUPP. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaXNceR8ZjkLG=dT3P=4A8SBsg0Z5h5PWLryF5=ghKq=g@mail.gmail.com/"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52928",
"lastModified": "2025-10-29T17:14:01.503",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-03-27T17:15:42.230",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e2fac197de2c4c041bdd8982cffb104689113f1"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74eec8266f37aff609db6a2f2b093e56a11c28c4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3178e8a434b58678d99257c0387810a24042fb6"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…