fkie_cve-2022-50488
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-04 16:15
Modified
2025-10-06 14:56
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic' Our test report a uaf for 'bfqq->bic' in 5.10: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30 CPU: 6 PID: 2318352 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.h602.kasan.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014 Call Trace: bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30 bfq_dispatch_request+0xe8/0x130 blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x62/0xb0 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x215/0x2a0 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x8f/0xd0 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x98/0x180 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x22b/0x240 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe3/0x190 blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x107/0x200 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x26e/0x3c0 blk_finish_plug+0x63/0x90 __iomap_dio_rw+0x7b5/0x910 iomap_dio_rw+0x36/0x80 ext4_dio_read_iter+0x146/0x190 [ext4] ext4_file_read_iter+0x1e2/0x230 [ext4] new_sync_read+0x29f/0x400 vfs_read+0x24e/0x2d0 ksys_read+0xd5/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6 Commit 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") changes that move process to a new cgroup will allocate a new bfqq to use, however, the old bfqq and new bfqq can point to the same bic: 1) Initial state, two process with io in the same cgroup. Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | Λ | Λ | | | | V | V | bfqq1 bfqq2 2) bfqq1 is merged to bfqq2. Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | | \-------------\| V bfqq1 bfqq2(coop) 3) Process 1 exit, then issue new io(denoce IOA) from Process 2. (BIC2) | Λ | | V | bfqq2(coop) 4) Before IOA is completed, move Process 2 to another cgroup and issue io. Process 2 (BIC2) Λ |\--------------\ | V bfqq2 bfqq3 Now that BIC2 points to bfqq3, while bfqq2 and bfqq3 both point to BIC2. If all the requests are completed, and Process 2 exit, BIC2 will be freed while there is no guarantee that bfqq2 will be freed before BIC2. Fix the problem by clearing bfqq->bic while bfqq is detached from bic.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nblock, bfq: fix possible uaf for \u0027bfqq-\u003ebic\u0027\n\nOur test report a uaf for \u0027bfqq-\u003ebic\u0027 in 5.10:\n\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30\n\nCPU: 6 PID: 2318352 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.h602.kasan.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30\n bfq_dispatch_request+0xe8/0x130\n blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x62/0xb0\n __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x215/0x2a0\n blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x8f/0xd0\n __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x98/0x180\n __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x22b/0x240\n blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe3/0x190\n blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x107/0x200\n blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x26e/0x3c0\n blk_finish_plug+0x63/0x90\n __iomap_dio_rw+0x7b5/0x910\n iomap_dio_rw+0x36/0x80\n ext4_dio_read_iter+0x146/0x190 [ext4]\n ext4_file_read_iter+0x1e2/0x230 [ext4]\n new_sync_read+0x29f/0x400\n vfs_read+0x24e/0x2d0\n ksys_read+0xd5/0x1b0\n do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6\n\nCommit 3bc5e683c67d (\"bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups\")\nchanges that move process to a new cgroup will allocate a new bfqq to\nuse, however, the old bfqq and new bfqq can point to the same bic:\n\n1) Initial state, two process with io in the same cgroup.\n\nProcess 1       Process 2\n (BIC1)          (BIC2)\n  |  \u039b            |  \u039b\n  |  |            |  |\n  V  |            V  |\n  bfqq1           bfqq2\n\n2) bfqq1 is merged to bfqq2.\n\nProcess 1       Process 2\n (BIC1)          (BIC2)\n  |               |\n   \\-------------\\|\n                  V\n  bfqq1           bfqq2(coop)\n\n3) Process 1 exit, then issue new io(denoce IOA) from Process 2.\n\n (BIC2)\n  |  \u039b\n  |  |\n  V  |\n  bfqq2(coop)\n\n4) Before IOA is completed, move Process 2 to another cgroup and issue io.\n\nProcess 2\n (BIC2)\n   \u039b\n   |\\--------------\\\n   |                V\n  bfqq2           bfqq3\n\nNow that BIC2 points to bfqq3, while bfqq2 and bfqq3 both point to BIC2.\nIf all the requests are completed, and Process 2 exit, BIC2 will be\nfreed while there is no guarantee that bfqq2 will be freed before BIC2.\n\nFix the problem by clearing bfqq-\u003ebic while bfqq is detached from bic."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-50488",
  "lastModified": "2025-10-06T14:56:47.823",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-10-04T16:15:45.707",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/094f3d9314d67691cb21ba091c1b528f6e3c4893"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5533742c7cb1bc9b1f0bf401cc397d44a3a9e07a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64dc8c732f5c2b406cc752e6aaa1bd5471159cab"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/761564d93c8265f65543acf0a576b32d66bfa26a"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b22fd72bfebda3956efc4431b60ddfc0a51e03e0"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…