fkie_cve-2022-49708
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-02-26 07:01
Modified
2025-02-26 07:01
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON:
==================================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211!
[...]
RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f
[...]
Call Trace:
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80
ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10
ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30
do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0
__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0
file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140
ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0
vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260
do_fsync+0x48/0xa0
[...]
==================================================================
Above issue may happen as follows:
-------------------------------------
do_fsync
vfs_fsync_range
ext4_sync_file
file_write_and_wait_range
__filemap_fdatawrite_range
do_writepages
ext4_writepages
mpage_map_and_submit_extent
mpage_map_one_extent
ext4_map_blocks
ext4_mb_new_blocks
ext4_mb_normalize_request
>>> start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical
ext4_mb_regular_allocator
ext4_mb_simple_scan_group
ext4_mb_use_best_found
ext4_mb_new_preallocation
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa
ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
>>> set ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0
ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used
>>> BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0);
we can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands:
`fallocate -l100M disk`
`mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk`
`mount disk /mnt`
`fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1`
The size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP.
Therefore, "start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical" may occur
when the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of
the group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment.
In addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP
is very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa\n\nHulk Robot reported a BUG_ON:\n==================================================================\nkernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211!\n[...]\nRIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30\n ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80\n ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10\n ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30\n do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0\n file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140\n ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0\n vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260\n do_fsync+0x48/0xa0\n[...]\n==================================================================\n\nAbove issue may happen as follows:\n-------------------------------------\ndo_fsync\n vfs_fsync_range\n ext4_sync_file\n file_write_and_wait_range\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range\n do_writepages\n ext4_writepages\n mpage_map_and_submit_extent\n mpage_map_one_extent\n ext4_map_blocks\n ext4_mb_new_blocks\n ext4_mb_normalize_request\n \u003e\u003e\u003e start + size \u003c= ac-\u003eac_o_ex.fe_logical\n ext4_mb_regular_allocator\n ext4_mb_simple_scan_group\n ext4_mb_use_best_found\n ext4_mb_new_preallocation\n ext4_mb_new_inode_pa\n ext4_mb_use_inode_pa\n \u003e\u003e\u003e set ac-\u003eac_b_ex.fe_len \u003c= 0\n ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used\n \u003e\u003e\u003e BUG_ON(ac-\u003eac_b_ex.fe_len \u003c= 0);\n\nwe can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands:\n\t`fallocate -l100M disk`\n\t`mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk`\n\t`mount disk /mnt`\n\t`fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1`\n\nThe size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP.\nTherefore, \"start + size \u003c= ac-\u003eac_o_ex.fe_logical\" may occur\nwhen the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of\nthe group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment.\nIn addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP\nis very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ext4: correcci\u00f3n de bug_on ext4_mb_use_inode_pa Hulk Robot inform\u00f3 de un BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f [...] Call Trace: ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80 ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10 ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30 do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0 file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140 ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0 vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260 do_fsync+0x48/0xa0 [...] ================================================================== El problema anterior puede ocurrir de la siguiente manera: ------------------------------------- do_fsync vfs_fsync_range ext4_sync_file file_write_and_wait_range __filemap_fdatawrite_range do_writepages ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent ext4_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; start + size \u0026lt;= ac-\u0026gt;ac_o_ex.fe_logical ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_simple_scan_group ext4_mb_use_best_found ext4_mb_new_preallocation ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ext4_mb_use_inode_pa \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; set ac-\u0026gt;ac_b_ex.fe_len \u0026lt;= 0 ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used \u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt; BUG_ON(ac-\u0026gt;ac_b_ex.fe_len \u0026lt;= 0); podemos reproducir f\u00e1cilmente este problema con los siguientes comandos: `fallocate -l100M disk` `mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk` `mount disk /mnt` `fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1` El tama\u00f1o debe ser menor o igual que EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP. Por lo tanto, puede aparecer \"start + size \u0026lt;= ac-\u0026gt;ac_o_ex.fe_logical\" cuando se trunca el tama\u00f1o. Por lo tanto, start debe ser la posici\u00f3n de inicio del grupo donde se encuentra ac_o_ex.fe_logical despu\u00e9s de la alineaci\u00f3n. Adem\u00e1s, cuando el valor de fe_logical o EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP es muy grande, el valor calculado por start_off es m\u00e1s preciso." } ], "id": "CVE-2022-49708", "lastModified": "2025-02-26T07:01:46.607", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-02-26T07:01:46.607", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5707d721d1819db57dba57b1d4623034fcb32047" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6880fb2e64331b9fdc85d3f32b1d7e81ad8703f1" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fdaf31ad5f3d3afab744dfd9a8b0d9142aa881f" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/887a3e9ad4b8309a2266bce7ae749b2bf1f7a687" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90f0f9d45dff0128c0fca0d2358c4153b024afa6" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a08f789d2ab5242c07e716baf9a835725046be89" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a37c1359714da42517dd19d36fc3c4d17edba832" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6b31616e5afe1d3972cb0682a373e50597faf5c" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…