fkie_cve-2021-38195
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2021-08-08 06:15
Modified
2024-11-21 06:16
Severity ?
Summary
An issue was discovered in the libsecp256k1 crate before 0.5.0 for Rust. It can verify an invalid signature because it allows the R or S parameter to be larger than the curve order, aka an overflow.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rustsec/advisory-db/main/crates/libsecp256k1/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.md | Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.html | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rustsec/advisory-db/main/crates/libsecp256k1/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.md | Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.html | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
parity | libsecp256k1 | * |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:parity:libsecp256k1:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "5F74B102-2A61-480B-B0FB-563E59C76989", "versionEndExcluding": "0.5.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in the libsecp256k1 crate before 0.5.0 for Rust. It can verify an invalid signature because it allows the R or S parameter to be larger than the curve order, aka an overflow." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "Se ha detectado un problema en la crate libsecp256k1 versiones anteriores a 0.5.0 para Rust. Puede verificar una firma no v\u00e1lida porque permite que el par\u00e1metro R o S sea mayor que el orden de la curva, lo que supone un desbordamiento" } ], "id": "CVE-2021-38195", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:16:37.403", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ], "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2021-08-08T06:15:09.117", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rustsec/advisory-db/main/crates/libsecp256k1/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.md" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.html" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rustsec/advisory-db/main/crates/libsecp256k1/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.md" }, { "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0076.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-347" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…