fkie_cve-2020-27222
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2021-02-03 16:15
Modified
2024-11-21 05:20
Severity ?
Summary
In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| emo@eclipse.org | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844 | Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844 | Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| eclipse | californium | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:californium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "56884583-F1FF-412F-B5E6-0AD0F904F260",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.6.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En Eclipse Californium versiones 2.3.0 hasta 2.6.0, los protocolos de enlace DTLS basados ??en certificados (x509 y RPK) cometen un fallo accidentalmente, porque el lado del servidor DTLS se adhiere a un estado interno equivocado.\u0026#xa0;Ese estado interno equivocado es ajustado por medio de un fallo de protocolo de enlace DTLS basada en un certificado anterior con una falta de coincidencia de los par\u00e1metros TLS.\u0026#xa0;El lado del servidor DTLS debe reiniciarse para recuperar esto.\u0026#xa0;Esto permite a clientes forzar una DoS"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2020-27222",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:20:53.557",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2021-02-03T16:15:13.117",
"references": [
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-372"
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…