fkie_cve-2016-7055
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2017-05-04 20:29
Modified
2024-11-21 02:57
Severity ?
Summary
There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.
References
Impacted products
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "5CE633C2-8643-4674-B321-0F11F5FD3EC8", versionEndExcluding: "1.0.2k", versionStartIncluding: "1.0.2", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "88B53681-5AB9-4081-8285-D8F6A82008C6", versionEndExcluding: "1.1.0c", versionStartIncluding: "1.1.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "A47FC4F7-1F77-4314-B4B3-3C5D8E335379", versionEndIncluding: "4.1.2", versionStartIncluding: "4.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "934083EB-2961-49FF-B8D7-B870D1FA3CB8", versionEndExcluding: "4.7.3", versionStartIncluding: "4.2.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "D107EC29-67E7-40C3-8E5A-324C9105C5E4", versionEndIncluding: "6.8.1", versionStartIncluding: "6.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "14346EBC-1890-472B-B236-06FE381229EC", versionEndExcluding: "6.9.5", versionStartIncluding: "6.9.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "2EE58CC5-2E12-4DA9-8AF2-9739CE393008", versionEndExcluding: "7.5.0", versionStartIncluding: "7.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Existe un error de propagación de acarreo en el procedimiento de multiplicación Montgomery Broadwell-specific en OpenSSL 1.0.2 y 1.1.0 en versiones anteriores a la 1.1.0c, que maneja longitudes de entrada divisibles por, pero más largas que 256 bits. El análisis sugiere que los ataques contra las claves privadas RSA, DSA y DH son imposibles. Esto se debe a que dicha subrutina no se utiliza en operaciones con la clave privada y una entrada elegida directamente por el atacante. En caso contrario, el error puede manifestarse como una autenticación transitoria o con errores en la negociación de claves o en un resultado erróneo reproducible en operaciones de clave pública a través de una entrada especialmente diseñada. Entre los algoritmos de Curva Eliptica solo los Brainpool P-512 están afectados y presumiblemente puede atacarse la negociación de claves ECDH. El impacto no se analizó en detalle, ya que los requisitos previos para el ataque se consideran improbables. Notese que varios clientes tienen que elegir la curva en cuestión y el servidor tiene que compartir la clave privada entre ellos, lo que no es un comportamiento por defecto en ningún caso. Incluso en esa situación, sólo los clientes que eligieron la curva se verán afectados.", }, ], id: "CVE-2016-7055", lastModified: "2024-11-21T02:57:22.287", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "LOW", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "HIGH", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 2.6, confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 4.9, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "HIGH", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 5.9, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 2.2, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2017-05-04T20:29:00.167", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "US Government Resource", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94242", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037261", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03752en_us", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03744en_us", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:02.openssl.asc", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-07", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20161110.txt", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-04", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "US Government Resource", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94242", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037261", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2185", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2186", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2187", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03752en_us", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry", ], url: "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03744en_us", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-17:02.openssl.asc", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-07", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20161110.txt", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-04", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.