fkie_cve-2016-3619
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2016-10-03 16:09
Modified
2024-11-21 02:50
Summary
The DumpModeEncode function in tif_dumpmode.c in the bmp2tiff tool in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier, when the "-c none" option is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via a crafted BMP image.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
libtiff libtiff 4.0.6



{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:4.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "33708995-494C-476D-B0E3-1E78B9328699",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "The DumpModeEncode function in tif_dumpmode.c in the bmp2tiff tool in LibTIFF 4.0.6 and earlier, when the \"-c none\" option is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via a crafted BMP image.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "La función DumpModeEncode en tif_dumpmode.c en la herramienta bmp2tiff en LibTIFF 4.0.6 y versiones anteriores, cuando la opción \"-c none\" es usada, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (sobre lectura del búfer) a través de una imagen BMP manipulada.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2016-3619",
   lastModified: "2024-11-21T02:50:23.963",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV2: [
         {
            acInsufInfo: false,
            baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
            cvssData: {
               accessComplexity: "MEDIUM",
               accessVector: "NETWORK",
               authentication: "NONE",
               availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL",
               baseScore: 4.3,
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               vectorString: "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
               version: "2.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 8.6,
            impactScore: 2.9,
            obtainAllPrivilege: false,
            obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
            obtainUserPrivilege: false,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
            userInteractionRequired: true,
         },
      ],
      cvssMetricV30: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 6.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "REQUIRED",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2016-10-03T16:09:00.180",
   references: [
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2567",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/07/1",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85919",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035508",
      },
      {
         source: "cve@mitre.org",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-16",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2567",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "Exploit",
            "Third Party Advisory",
         ],
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/07/1",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/85919",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035508",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-16",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-125",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.