fkie_cve-2016-10530
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2018-05-31 20:29
Modified
2024-11-21 02:44
Severity ?
Summary
The airbrake module 0.3.8 and earlier defaults to sending environment variables over HTTP. Environment variables can often times contain secret keys and other sensitive values. A malicious user could be on the same network as a regular user and intercept all the secret keys the user is sending. This goes against common best practice, which is to use HTTPS.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| support@hackerone.com | https://github.com/airbrake/node-airbrake/issues/70 | Broken Link, Third Party Advisory | |
| support@hackerone.com | https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/96 | Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://github.com/airbrake/node-airbrake/issues/70 | Broken Link, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/96 | Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:airbrake:airbrake:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A04BD868-38C4-4BD1-BA39-459492C770C2",
"versionEndIncluding": "0.3.8",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The airbrake module 0.3.8 and earlier defaults to sending environment variables over HTTP. Environment variables can often times contain secret keys and other sensitive values. A malicious user could be on the same network as a regular user and intercept all the secret keys the user is sending. This goes against common best practice, which is to use HTTPS."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El m\u00f3dulo airbrake en versiones 0.3.8 y anteriores env\u00eda por defecto variables por HTTP. Estas variables de entorno pueden contener a veces claves secretas y otros valores sensibles. Un usuario malicioso podr\u00eda estar en la misma red que un usuario regular e interceptar todas las claves secretas que el usuario regular est\u00e9 enviando. Esto va en contra de la mejor pr\u00e1ctica com\u00fan, que es emplear HTTPS."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-10530",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:44:12.643",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2018-05-31T20:29:00.987",
"references": [
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Broken Link",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/airbrake/node-airbrake/issues/70"
},
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/96"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Broken Link",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/airbrake/node-airbrake/issues/70"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/96"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…