fkie_cve-2015-6254
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-08-17 20:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| picketlink | picketlink | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:picketlink:picketlink:*:cr5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "570FB892-EA67-4E76-A218-DF3398C47814",
"versionEndIncluding": "2.6.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad en el (1) Proveedor de Servicio (SP) y (2) Proveedor de Identidad (IdP) en PicketLink en versiones anteriores a 2.7.0, no asegura que el atributo Destination en un elemento Response en una aserci\u00f3n SAML coincida con la ubicaci\u00f3n desde la que se recibi\u00f3 el mensaje, lo que permite a atacantes remotos tener un impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de vectores desconocidos. NOTA: este identificador fue SEPARADO de CVE-205-0277 por ADT2 debido a los diferentes tipos de vulnerabilidad."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-6254",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 6.8,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2015-08-17T20:59:01.763",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194832"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-680"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-17"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…