fkie_cve-2015-2963
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-07-10 17:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The thoughtbot paperclip gem before 4.2.2 for Ruby does not consider the content-type value during media-type validation, which allows remote attackers to upload HTML documents and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a spoofed value, as demonstrated by image/jpeg.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| thoughtbot | paperclip | * |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:thoughtbot:paperclip:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DE525443-1C61-4909-A20A-38209B765FBE",
"versionEndIncluding": "4.2.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The thoughtbot paperclip gem before 4.2.2 for Ruby does not consider the content-type value during media-type validation, which allows remote attackers to upload HTML documents and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a spoofed value, as demonstrated by image/jpeg."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Thoughtbot paperclip gem en versiones anteriores a la 4.2.2 para Ruby no tiene en cuenta el valor de tipo de contenido durante la validaci\u00f3n de tipo de medios, lo que permite a atacantes remotos subir documentos HTML y realizar cross-site scripting (XSS) a trav\u00e9s de un valor suplantado, como se demuestra por la imagen / jpeg."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-2963",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2015-07-10T17:59:00.093",
"references": [
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83881261/index.html"
},
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000088"
},
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/19/3"
},
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75304"
},
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/commit/9aee4112f36058cd28d5fe4a006d6981bd1eda57"
},
{
"source": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://robots.thoughtbot.com/paperclip-security-release"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83881261/index.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2015-000088"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/06/19/3"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75304"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/commit/9aee4112f36058cd28d5fe4a006d6981bd1eda57"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://robots.thoughtbot.com/paperclip-security-release"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "vultures@jpcert.or.jp",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-79"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…