fkie_cve-2015-1571
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-02-10 20:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says "The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack.
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:5.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "823C8357-E638-4EAE-B231-3B60263FFE52",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"disputed"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The CAPWAP DTLS protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 uses the same certificate and private key across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the Fortinet_Factory certificate and private key. NOTE: FG-IR-15-002 says \"The Fortinet_Factory certificate is unique to each device ... An attacker cannot therefore stage a MitM attack."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "** DISPUTADA ** La implementaci\u00f3n del protocolo CAPWAP DTLS en Fortinet FortiOS 5.0 Patch 7 build 4457 utiliza el mismo certificado y clave privada a trav\u00e9s de las distintas instalaciones de los clientes, lo que hace que sea m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores SSL aprovechando la clave privada y certificado Fortinet_Factory. NOTA: FG-IR-15-002 dice \"El certificado Fortinet_Factory es \u00fanico para cada dispositivo ... Un atacante no puede por tanto perpetrar un ataque MitM\"."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2015-1571",
"lastModified": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2015-02-10T20:59:06.263",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/125"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FG-IR-15-002/"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit"
],
"url": "http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/advisory/Fortinet_FortiOS_Multiple_Vulnerabilities.pdf"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…