fkie_cve-2013-1296
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2013-04-09 22:55
Modified
2024-11-21 01:49
Severity ?
Summary
The Remote Desktop ActiveX control in mstscax.dll in Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Client 6.1 and 7.0 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a web page that triggers access to a deleted object, and allows remote RDP servers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger access to a deleted object, aka "RDP ActiveX Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
References
secure@microsoft.comhttp://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-100AUS Government Resource
secure@microsoft.comhttps://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-029
secure@microsoft.comhttps://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16598
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-100AUS Government Resource
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-029
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16598
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
microsoft remote_desktop_connection 6.1
microsoft remote_desktop_connection 7.0


To clipboard 

{
   configurations: [
      {
         nodes: [
            {
               cpeMatch: [
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:remote_desktop_connection:6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "81826081-342A-4C8F-BE9F-1B6D04C9FE8F",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
                  {
                     criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:remote_desktop_connection:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                     matchCriteriaId: "126D74D1-4A04-493F-900E-B04E65CB7A2E",
                     vulnerable: true,
                  },
               ],
               negate: false,
               operator: "OR",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "The Remote Desktop ActiveX control in mstscax.dll in Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Client 6.1 and 7.0 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a web page that triggers access to a deleted object, and allows remote RDP servers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger access to a deleted object, aka \"RDP ActiveX Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.\"",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "El Remote Desktop ActiveX control en mstscax.dll en Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Client v6.1 y v7.0 no controla correctamente los objetos en memoria, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una página web que pone en marcha el acceso a un objeto eliminado, y permite remoto RDP servidores para ejecutar código arbitrario a través de vectores no especificados que el acceso de disparo a un objeto eliminado, alias \"RDP ActiveX control de código vulnerabilidad de ejecución remota\".",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2013-1296",
   lastModified: "2024-11-21T01:49:17.320",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV2: [
         {
            acInsufInfo: false,
            baseSeverity: "HIGH",
            cvssData: {
               accessComplexity: "MEDIUM",
               accessVector: "NETWORK",
               authentication: "NONE",
               availabilityImpact: "COMPLETE",
               baseScore: 9.3,
               confidentialityImpact: "COMPLETE",
               integrityImpact: "COMPLETE",
               vectorString: "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
               version: "2.0",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 8.6,
            impactScore: 10,
            obtainAllPrivilege: false,
            obtainOtherPrivilege: false,
            obtainUserPrivilege: false,
            source: "nvd@nist.gov",
            type: "Primary",
            userInteractionRequired: true,
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2013-04-09T22:55:01.203",
   references: [
      {
         source: "secure@microsoft.com",
         tags: [
            "US Government Resource",
         ],
         url: "http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-100A",
      },
      {
         source: "secure@microsoft.com",
         url: "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-029",
      },
      {
         source: "secure@microsoft.com",
         url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16598",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         tags: [
            "US Government Resource",
         ],
         url: "http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA13-100A",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2013/ms13-029",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16598",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "secure@microsoft.com",
   vulnStatus: "Modified",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-94",
            },
         ],
         source: "nvd@nist.gov",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.