fkie_cve-2013-0157
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2014-01-21 18:55
Modified
2024-11-21 01:46
Severity ?
Summary
(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
kernel | util-linux | 2.14.1 | |
kernel | util-linux | 2.17.2 |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:kernel:util-linux:2.14.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "E649C864-64A2-46A1-8D11-C2B5AE0122B8", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:kernel:util-linux:2.17.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "21667158-8A4D-4EF8-9E96-E35B4885480B", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "(a) mount and (b) umount in util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, and probably other versions allow local users to determine the existence of restricted directories by (1) using the --guess-fstype command-line option or (2) attempting to mount a non-existent device, which generates different error messages depending on whether the directory exists.", }, { lang: "es", value: "(a) mount y (b) unmount en util-linux 2.14.1, 2.17.2, y probablemente otras versiones permite a usuarios locales determinar la existencia de directorios restringidos mediante (1) el uso de la opción de comando --guess-fstype command-line o (2) intentar montar un dispositivo inexistente, lo que genera diferentes mensajes de error dependiendo de si el directorio existe.", }, ], id: "CVE-2013-0157", lastModified: "2024-11-21T01:46:57.693", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "LOW", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "LOCAL", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 2.1, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "NONE", vectorString: "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 2.9, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], }, published: "2014-01-21T18:55:09.007", references: [ { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://bugs.debian.org/697464", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=135749410312247&w=2", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://osvdb.org/88953", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:154", }, { source: "secalert@redhat.com", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892330", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://bugs.debian.org/697464", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=135749410312247&w=2", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://osvdb.org/88953", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0517.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:154", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892330", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-200", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.