fkie_cve-2011-0019
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2011-02-23 19:00
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| fedoraproject | 389_directory_server | 1.2.7.5 | |
| redhat | directory_server | 8.2 | |
| redhat | directory_server | 8.2.3 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:fedoraproject:389_directory_server:1.2.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "17C879AE-7435-43F5-94E5-A7ED84E46D0F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:8.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EDC61481-16C5-44EF-AA40-8423A40B2581",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:8.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C92B4226-6D3D-4430-A753-92E828FBBB8C",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "slapd (tambi\u00e9n conocido como ns-slapd) en 389 Directory Server v1.2.7.5 (tambi\u00e9n conocido como Red Hat Directory Server v8.2.x o dirsrv) no gestiona correctamente las consultas paginadas simples, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda de demonio) o posiblemente tengan un impacto no especificado a trav\u00e9s de peticiones de b\u00fasqueda m\u00faltiples."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2011-0019",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
]
},
"published": "2011-02-23T19:00:01.670",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0293.html"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46489"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025102"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666076"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670914"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0293.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46489"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025102"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666076"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670914"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…