fkie_cve-2010-2971
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2010-08-05 13:22
Modified
2025-04-11 00:51
Severity ?
Summary
loaders/load_it.c in libmikmod, possibly 3.1.12, does not properly account for the larger size of name##env relative to name##tick and name##node, which allows remote attackers to trigger a buffer over-read and possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted Impulse Tracker file, a related issue to CVE-2010-2546. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-3995.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| raphael_assenat | libmikmod | 3.1.12 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:raphael_assenat:libmikmod:3.1.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6EB33FA6-1F1A-4255-B468-19036B180C29",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "loaders/load_it.c in libmikmod, possibly 3.1.12, does not properly account for the larger size of name##env relative to name##tick and name##node, which allows remote attackers to trigger a buffer over-read and possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted Impulse Tracker file, a related issue to CVE-2010-2546. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-3995."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "oaders/load_it.c en libmikmod, posiblemente v3.1.12, no considera adecuadamente los tama\u00f1os grandes de name##env en relaci\u00f3n con name##tick y name##node, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos disparar una sobre-lectura de b\u00fafer y posiblemente tener otros impactos no especificados a trav\u00e9s de ficheros Impulse Tracker manipulados, relacionado con el comportamiento de CVE-2010-2546. OTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una soluci\u00f3n incompleta de CVE-2009-3995."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2010-2971",
"lastModified": "2025-04-11T00:51:21.963",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 10.0,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": true
}
]
},
"published": "2010-08-05T13:22:29.997",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48244"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-10.xml"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail\u0026aid=3033086\u0026group_id=40531\u0026atid=428227"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2081"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:151"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614643"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48244"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-10.xml"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail\u0026aid=3033086\u0026group_id=40531\u0026atid=428227"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2081"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:151"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614643"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…