fkie_cve-2007-1435
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2007-03-13 19:19
Modified
2025-04-09 00:30
Severity ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in D-Link TFTP Server 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long (1) GET or (2) PUT request, which triggers memory corruption. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://osvdb.org/33977
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/24360Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22923
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://osvdb.org/33977
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/24360Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22923
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
d-link tftp_server 1.0


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:d-link:tftp_server:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "07DDF644-9706-444B-8957-93AABFA3D1EA",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Buffer overflow in D-Link TFTP Server 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long (1) GET or (2) PUT request, which triggers memory corruption.  NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en D-Link TFTP Server 1.0 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (ca\u00edda) mediante una petici\u00f3n (1) GET o (2) PUT larga. NOTA: la procedencia de esta informaci\u00f3n es desconocida; los detalles se han obtenido de informaci\u00f3n de terceros."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2007-1435",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-09T00:30:58.490",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "baseScore": 10.0,
          "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 10.0,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": true,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2007-03-13T19:19:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/33977"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24360"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22923"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/33977"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24360"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22923"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.