fkie_cve-2004-2685
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2004-12-31 05:00
Modified
2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
Buffer overflow in YoungZSoft CCProxy 6.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long address in a ping (p) command to the Telnet proxy service, a different vector than CVE-2004-2416.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://secunia.com/advisories/13085Vendor Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.youngzsoft.net/ccproxy/whatsnew.htm
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4360
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/621
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://secunia.com/advisories/13085Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.youngzsoft.net/ccproxy/whatsnew.htm
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4360
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/621
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
youngzsoft ccproxy *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:youngzsoft:ccproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "37395ED6-7BA7-48D4-8A4D-E79EDC35F0C3",
              "versionEndIncluding": "6.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Buffer overflow in YoungZSoft CCProxy 6.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long address in a ping (p) command to the Telnet proxy service, a different vector than CVE-2004-2416."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2004-2685",
  "lastModified": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
        "impactScore": 6.4,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2004-12-31T05:00:00.000",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13085"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "http://www.youngzsoft.net/ccproxy/whatsnew.htm"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4360"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/621"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13085"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "http://www.youngzsoft.net/ccproxy/whatsnew.htm"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4360"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/621"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-119"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.