CVE-2026-6665 (GCVE-0-2026-6665)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-09 00:43 – Updated: 2026-05-09 00:43
VLAI?
Title
PgBouncer buffer overflow in SCRAM
Summary
The SCRAM code in PgBouncer before 1.25.2 did not check the return value of strlcat() correctly when building the contents of the SCRAM client-final-message. A malicious backend that sends a SCRAM server-final-message with a long nonce can trigger a stack overflow.
Severity ?
8.1 (High)
CWE
- CWE-121 - Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Assigner
References
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PgBouncer",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thanks to HarutoKimura for finding and reporting this problem."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The SCRAM code in PgBouncer before 1.25.2 did not check the return value of strlcat() correctly when building the contents of the SCRAM client-final-message. A malicious backend that sends a SCRAM server-final-message with a long nonce can trigger a stack overflow."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "Stack-based Buffer Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-09T00:43:46.762Z",
"orgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"shortName": "PostgreSQL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.pgbouncer.org/changelog.html#pgbouncer-125x"
}
],
"title": "PgBouncer buffer overflow in SCRAM"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007",
"assignerShortName": "PostgreSQL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6665",
"datePublished": "2026-05-09T00:43:46.762Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-20T12:25:43.793Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-09T00:43:46.762Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-6665",
"date": "2026-05-10",
"epss": "0.00017",
"percentile": "0.0429"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-6665\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"published\":\"2026-05-09T01:16:09.013\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-09T01:16:09.013\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The SCRAM code in PgBouncer before 1.25.2 did not check the return value of strlcat() correctly when building the contents of the SCRAM client-final-message. A malicious backend that sends a SCRAM server-final-message with a long nonce can trigger a stack overflow.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-121\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.pgbouncer.org/changelog.html#pgbouncer-125x\",\"source\":\"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…