CVE-2025-68740 (GCVE-0-2025-68740)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-12-24 12:09
Modified
2025-12-24 12:09
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()
In ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to
the rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the 'if (!rc)' check
and sets 'result = true'. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing
extra files to be measured by IMA.
This issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:
After unloading the SELinux policy module via 'semodule -d', if an IMA
measurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,
in ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the 'if (rc == -ESTALE &&
!rule_reinitialized)' block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In
ima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule
becomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns
-ENOENT. This bypasses the 'if (!rc)' check and results in a false match.
Call trace:
selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8
security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0
ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0
ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8
ima_get_action+0x48/0x60
process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98
ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8
security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78
search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318
exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8
bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130
do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258
__arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0
do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
el0_svc+0x44/0x200
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130
el0t_64_sync+0x3c8/0x3d0
Fix this by changing 'if (!rc)' to 'if (rc <= 0)' to ensure that error
codes like -ENOENT do not bypass the check and accidentally result in a
successful match.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "c2238d487a640ae3511e1b6f4640ab27ce10d7f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "de4431faf308d0c533cb386f5fa9af009bc86158",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "32952c4f4d1b2deb30dce72ba109da808a9018e1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "738c9738e690f5cea24a3ad6fd2d9a323cf614f6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4af4662fa4a9dc62289c580337ae2506339c4729",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.30"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.30",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.17.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.17.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.19-rc1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.30",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.17.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.30",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.30",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19-rc1",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.30",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()\n\nIn ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to\nthe rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 check\nand sets \u0027result = true\u0027. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing\nextra files to be measured by IMA.\n\nThis issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:\nAfter unloading the SELinux policy module via \u0027semodule -d\u0027, if an IMA\nmeasurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,\nin ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns\n-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the \u0027if (rc == -ESTALE \u0026\u0026\n!rule_reinitialized)\u0027 block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In\nima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule\nbecomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns\n-ENOENT. This bypasses the \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 check and results in a false match.\n\nCall trace:\n selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8\n security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0\n ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0\n ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8\n ima_get_action+0x48/0x60\n process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98\n ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8\n security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78\n search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318\n exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8\n bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130\n do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258\n __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68\n invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0\n do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38\n el0_svc+0x44/0x200\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130\n el0t_64_sync+0x3c8/0x3d0\n\nFix this by changing \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 to \u0027if (rc \u003c= 0)\u0027 to ensure that error\ncodes like -ENOENT do not bypass the check and accidentally result in a\nsuccessful match."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-24T12:09:37.971Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2238d487a640ae3511e1b6f4640ab27ce10d7f6"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de4431faf308d0c533cb386f5fa9af009bc86158"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32952c4f4d1b2deb30dce72ba109da808a9018e1"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/738c9738e690f5cea24a3ad6fd2d9a323cf614f6"
}
],
"title": "ima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-68740",
"datePublished": "2025-12-24T12:09:37.971Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-24T10:30:51.030Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-24T12:09:37.971Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-68740\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-12-24T13:16:28.943\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-12-24T13:16:28.943\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nima: Handle error code returned by ima_filter_rule_match()\\n\\nIn ima_match_rules(), if ima_filter_rule_match() returns -ENOENT due to\\nthe rule being NULL, the function incorrectly skips the \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 check\\nand sets \u0027result = true\u0027. The LSM rule is considered a match, causing\\nextra files to be measured by IMA.\\n\\nThis issue can be reproduced in the following scenario:\\nAfter unloading the SELinux policy module via \u0027semodule -d\u0027, if an IMA\\nmeasurement is triggered before ima_lsm_rules is updated,\\nin ima_match_rules(), the first call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns\\n-ESTALE. This causes the code to enter the \u0027if (rc == -ESTALE \u0026\u0026\\n!rule_reinitialized)\u0027 block, perform ima_lsm_copy_rule() and retry. In\\nima_lsm_copy_rule(), since the SELinux module has been removed, the rule\\nbecomes NULL, and the second call to ima_filter_rule_match() returns\\n-ENOENT. This bypasses the \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 check and results in a false match.\\n\\nCall trace:\\n selinux_audit_rule_match+0x310/0x3b8\\n security_audit_rule_match+0x60/0xa0\\n ima_match_rules+0x2e4/0x4a0\\n ima_match_policy+0x9c/0x1e8\\n ima_get_action+0x48/0x60\\n process_measurement+0xf8/0xa98\\n ima_bprm_check+0x98/0xd8\\n security_bprm_check+0x5c/0x78\\n search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x318\\n exec_binprm+0x58/0x1b8\\n bprm_execve+0xb8/0x130\\n do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1a8/0x258\\n __arm64_sys_execve+0x48/0x68\\n invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128\\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0\\n do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38\\n el0_svc+0x44/0x200\\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130\\n el0t_64_sync+0x3c8/0x3d0\\n\\nFix this by changing \u0027if (!rc)\u0027 to \u0027if (rc \u003c= 0)\u0027 to ensure that error\\ncodes like -ENOENT do not bypass the check and accidentally result in a\\nsuccessful match.\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32952c4f4d1b2deb30dce72ba109da808a9018e1\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/738c9738e690f5cea24a3ad6fd2d9a323cf614f6\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2238d487a640ae3511e1b6f4640ab27ce10d7f6\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de4431faf308d0c533cb386f5fa9af009bc86158\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…