CVE-2025-62491 (GCVE-0-2025-62491)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-10-16 15:51
Modified
2025-10-16 18:04
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-416 - Use After Free
Summary
A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine's standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (ts->rejected_promise_list).
* The function js_std_promise_rejection_check attempts to iterate over the rejected_promise_list to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.
* The reason for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling js_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp->reason).
* If the promise rejection reason is an Error object that defines a custom property getter (e.g., via Object.defineProperty), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.
* The malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls catch() on the same rejected promise being processed.
* Calling catch() internally triggers js_std_promise_rejection_tracker, which then removes and frees the current promise entry (JSRejectedPromiseEntry) from the rejected_promise_list.
* Since the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (el), the subsequent loop access results in a Use-After-Free condition.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-62491",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-16T18:03:58.190903Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-16T18:04:16.529Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://bellard.org/quickjs/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "js_std_promise_rejection_check",
"product": "QuickJS",
"vendor": "QuickJS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2025-09-13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025-04-26",
"versionType": "date"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Google Big Sleep"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-24T22:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA \u003cb\u003eUse-After-Free (UAF)\u003c/b\u003e vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine\u0027s standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (\u003ccode\u003ets-\u0026gt;rejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe function \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ejs_std_promise_rejection_check\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e attempts to iterate over the \u003ccode\u003erejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cb\u003ereason\u003c/b\u003e for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling \u003ccode\u003ejs_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp-\u0026gt;reason)\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf the promise \u003cb\u003erejection reason\u003c/b\u003e is an \u003cb\u003eError object\u003c/b\u003e that defines a custom property \u003cb\u003egetter\u003c/b\u003e (e.g., via \u003ccode\u003eObject.defineProperty\u003c/code\u003e), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ecatch()\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e on the \u003ci\u003esame\u003c/i\u003e rejected promise being processed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eCalling \u003ccode\u003ecatch()\u003c/code\u003e internally triggers \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ejs_std_promise_rejection_tracker\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e, which then \u003cb\u003eremoves and frees\u003c/b\u003e the current promise entry (\u003ccode\u003eJSRejectedPromiseEntry\u003c/code\u003e) from the \u003ccode\u003erejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eSince the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (\u003ccode\u003eel\u003c/code\u003e), the subsequent loop access results in a \u003cb\u003eUse-After-Free\u003c/b\u003e condition.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine\u0027s standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (ts-\u003erejected_promise_list).\n\n * The function js_std_promise_rejection_check attempts to iterate over the rejected_promise_list to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.\n\n\n * The reason for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling js_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp-\u003ereason).\n\n\n * If the promise rejection reason is an Error object that defines a custom property getter (e.g., via Object.defineProperty), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.\n\n\n * The malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls catch() on the same rejected promise being processed.\n\n\n * Calling catch() internally triggers js_std_promise_rejection_tracker, which then removes and frees the current promise entry (JSRejectedPromiseEntry) from the rejected_promise_list.\n\n\n * Since the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (el), the subsequent loop access results in a Use-After-Free condition."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-175",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-175 Code Inclusion"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-416",
"description": "CWE-416 Use After Free",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-16T15:51:24.238Z",
"orgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"shortName": "Google"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bellard.org/quickjs/Changelog"
},
{
"url": "https://issuetracker.google.com/434195203"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Use-after-free in js_std_promise_rejection_check in QuickJS",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778",
"assignerShortName": "Google",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-62491",
"datePublished": "2025-10-16T15:51:24.238Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-15T08:47:41.878Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-16T18:04:16.529Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-62491\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve-coordination@google.com\",\"published\":\"2025-10-16T16:15:39.470\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-10-30T16:27:28.127\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine\u0027s standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (ts-\u003erejected_promise_list).\\n\\n * The function js_std_promise_rejection_check attempts to iterate over the rejected_promise_list to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.\\n\\n\\n * The reason for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling js_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp-\u003ereason).\\n\\n\\n * If the promise rejection reason is an Error object that defines a custom property getter (e.g., via Object.defineProperty), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.\\n\\n\\n * The malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls catch() on the same rejected promise being processed.\\n\\n\\n * Calling catch() internally triggers js_std_promise_rejection_tracker, which then removes and frees the current promise entry (JSRejectedPromiseEntry) from the rejected_promise_list.\\n\\n\\n * Since the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (el), the subsequent loop access results in a Use-After-Free condition.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cve-coordination@google.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"PASSIVE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve-coordination@google.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-416\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:quickjs_project:quickjs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2025-09-13\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AB84E2DC-74EA-4956-9521-C2B652B8E8C2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bellard.org/quickjs/Changelog\",\"source\":\"cve-coordination@google.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://issuetracker.google.com/434195203\",\"source\":\"cve-coordination@google.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-62491\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-10-16T18:03:58.190903Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-16T18:04:10.405Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Use-after-free in js_std_promise_rejection_check in QuickJS\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Google Big Sleep\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-175\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-175 Code Inclusion\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"PASSIVE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"QuickJS\", \"product\": \"QuickJS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2025-04-26\", \"lessThan\": \"2025-09-13\", \"versionType\": \"date\"}], \"packageName\": \"js_std_promise_rejection_check\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://bellard.org/quickjs/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-07-24T22:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://bellard.org/quickjs/Changelog\"}, {\"url\": \"https://issuetracker.google.com/434195203\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine\u0027s standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (ts-\u003erejected_promise_list).\\n\\n * The function js_std_promise_rejection_check attempts to iterate over the rejected_promise_list to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.\\n\\n\\n * The reason for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling js_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp-\u003ereason).\\n\\n\\n * If the promise rejection reason is an Error object that defines a custom property getter (e.g., via Object.defineProperty), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.\\n\\n\\n * The malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls catch() on the same rejected promise being processed.\\n\\n\\n * Calling catch() internally triggers js_std_promise_rejection_tracker, which then removes and frees the current promise entry (JSRejectedPromiseEntry) from the rejected_promise_list.\\n\\n\\n * Since the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (el), the subsequent loop access results in a Use-After-Free condition.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eA \u003cb\u003eUse-After-Free (UAF)\u003c/b\u003e vulnerability exists in the QuickJS engine\u0027s standard library when iterating over the global list of unhandled rejected promises (\u003ccode\u003ets-\u0026gt;rejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe function \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ejs_std_promise_rejection_check\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e attempts to iterate over the \u003ccode\u003erejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e to report unhandled rejections using a standard list loop.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cb\u003ereason\u003c/b\u003e for a promise rejection is processed inside the loop, including calling \u003ccode\u003ejs_std_dump_error1(ctx, rp-\u0026gt;reason)\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf the promise \u003cb\u003erejection reason\u003c/b\u003e is an \u003cb\u003eError object\u003c/b\u003e that defines a custom property \u003cb\u003egetter\u003c/b\u003e (e.g., via \u003ccode\u003eObject.defineProperty\u003c/code\u003e), this getter is executed during the error dumping process.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe malicious custom getter can execute JavaScript code that calls \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ecatch()\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e on the \u003ci\u003esame\u003c/i\u003e rejected promise being processed.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eCalling \u003ccode\u003ecatch()\u003c/code\u003e internally triggers \u003cb\u003e\u003ccode\u003ejs_std_promise_rejection_tracker\u003c/code\u003e\u003c/b\u003e, which then \u003cb\u003eremoves and frees\u003c/b\u003e the current promise entry (\u003ccode\u003eJSRejectedPromiseEntry\u003c/code\u003e) from the \u003ccode\u003erejected_promise_list\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eSince the list iteration continues using the now-freed memory pointer (\u003ccode\u003eel\u003c/code\u003e), the subsequent loop access results in a \u003cb\u003eUse-After-Free\u003c/b\u003e condition.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-416\", \"description\": \"CWE-416 Use After Free\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778\", \"shortName\": \"Google\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-16T15:51:24.238Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-62491\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-16T18:04:16.529Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-10-15T08:47:41.878Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"14ed7db2-1595-443d-9d34-6215bf890778\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-10-16T15:51:24.238Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Google\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…