CVE-2025-53007 (GCVE-0-2025-53007)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-06-26 14:45
Modified
2025-06-27 16:09
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-113 - Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
Summary
arduino-esp32 provides an Arduino core for the ESP32. Versions prior to 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability. The `sendHeader` function takes arbitrary input for the HTTP header name and value, concatenates them into an HTTP header line, and appends this to the outgoing HTTP response headers. There is no validation or sanitization of the `name` or `value` parameters before they are included in the HTTP response. If an attacker can control the input to `sendHeader` (either directly or indirectly), they could inject carriage return (`\r`) or line feed (`\n`) characters into either the header name or value. This could allow the attacker to inject additional headers, manipulate the structure of the HTTP response, potentially inject an entire new HTTP response (HTTP Response Splitting), and/or ause header confusion or other HTTP protocol attacks. Versions 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a fix for the issue.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| espressif | arduino-esp32 |
Version: < 3.2.1 Version: >= 3.3.0-alpha1, < 3.3.0-RC1 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-53007",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-27T16:02:17.500617Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-27T16:09:37.079Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "arduino-esp32",
"vendor": "espressif",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.3.0-alpha1, \u003c 3.3.0-RC1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "arduino-esp32 provides an Arduino core for the ESP32. Versions prior to 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability. The `sendHeader` function takes arbitrary input for the HTTP header name and value, concatenates them into an HTTP header line, and appends this to the outgoing HTTP response headers. There is no validation or sanitization of the `name` or `value` parameters before they are included in the HTTP response. If an attacker can control the input to `sendHeader` (either directly or indirectly), they could inject carriage return (`\\r`) or line feed (`\\n`) characters into either the header name or value. This could allow the attacker to inject additional headers, manipulate the structure of the HTTP response, potentially inject an entire new HTTP response (HTTP Response Splitting), and/or ause header confusion or other HTTP protocol attacks. Versions 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a fix for the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-113",
"description": "CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Splitting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-26T14:45:40.839Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/security/advisories/GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/security/advisories/GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/commit/21640ac82a1bb5efa8cf0b3841be1ac80add6785",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/commit/21640ac82a1bb5efa8cf0b3841be1ac80add6785"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L504-L521",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L504-L521"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L577-L582",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L577-L582"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "arduino-esp32 vulnerable to CRLF injection in WebServer.cpp"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-53007",
"datePublished": "2025-06-26T14:45:40.839Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-24T03:50:36.795Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-27T16:09:37.079Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-53007\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-06-26T15:15:24.043\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-06-26T18:57:43.670\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"arduino-esp32 provides an Arduino core for the ESP32. Versions prior to 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability. The `sendHeader` function takes arbitrary input for the HTTP header name and value, concatenates them into an HTTP header line, and appends this to the outgoing HTTP response headers. There is no validation or sanitization of the `name` or `value` parameters before they are included in the HTTP response. If an attacker can control the input to `sendHeader` (either directly or indirectly), they could inject carriage return (`\\\\r`) or line feed (`\\\\n`) characters into either the header name or value. This could allow the attacker to inject additional headers, manipulate the structure of the HTTP response, potentially inject an entire new HTTP response (HTTP Response Splitting), and/or ause header confusion or other HTTP protocol attacks. Versions 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a fix for the issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-113\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L504-L521\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L577-L582\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/commit/21640ac82a1bb5efa8cf0b3841be1ac80add6785\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/security/advisories/GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-53007\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-06-27T16:02:17.500617Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-27T16:06:19.279Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"arduino-esp32 vulnerable to CRLF injection in WebServer.cpp\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"espressif\", \"product\": \"arduino-esp32\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 3.2.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 3.3.0-alpha1, \u003c 3.3.0-RC1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/security/advisories/GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/security/advisories/GHSA-5476-9jjq-563m\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/commit/21640ac82a1bb5efa8cf0b3841be1ac80add6785\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/commit/21640ac82a1bb5efa8cf0b3841be1ac80add6785\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L504-L521\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L504-L521\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L577-L582\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/blob/9e61fa7e4bce59c05cb17c15b11b53b9bafca077/libraries/WebServer/src/WebServer.cpp#L577-L582\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"arduino-esp32 provides an Arduino core for the ESP32. Versions prior to 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability. The `sendHeader` function takes arbitrary input for the HTTP header name and value, concatenates them into an HTTP header line, and appends this to the outgoing HTTP response headers. There is no validation or sanitization of the `name` or `value` parameters before they are included in the HTTP response. If an attacker can control the input to `sendHeader` (either directly or indirectly), they could inject carriage return (`\\\\r`) or line feed (`\\\\n`) characters into either the header name or value. This could allow the attacker to inject additional headers, manipulate the structure of the HTTP response, potentially inject an entire new HTTP response (HTTP Response Splitting), and/or ause header confusion or other HTTP protocol attacks. Versions 3.3.0-RC1 and 3.2.1 contain a fix for the issue.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-113\", \"description\": \"CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Splitting\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-26T14:45:40.839Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-53007\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-27T16:09:37.079Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-06-24T03:50:36.795Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-06-26T14:45:40.839Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…