CVE-2025-40779 (GCVE-0-2025-40779)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-08-27 20:23
Modified
2025-08-28 14:08
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CWE
  • CWE-476 - NULL Pointer Dereference
Summary
If a DHCPv4 client sends a request with some specific options, and Kea fails to find an appropriate subnet for the client, the `kea-dhcp4` process will abort with an assertion failure. This happens only if the client request is unicast directly to Kea; broadcast messages do not cause the problem. This issue affects Kea versions 2.7.1 through 2.7.9, 3.0.0, and 3.1.0.
References
security-officer@isc.orghttps://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2025-40779
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ISC Kea Version: 2.7.1   <
Version: 3.0.0
Version: 3.1.0
Patch: 2.6.0
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-40779",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-28T14:07:45.683079Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T14:08:05.935Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Kea",
          "vendor": "ISC",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.7.9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.7.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.1.0"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.6.4",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "2.6.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "ISC would like to thank the following for bringing this vulnerability to our attention:\n\n* Jochen M.\n* Martin Dinev, Trading212\n* Ashwani Kumar, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education \u0026 Research, Chandigarh, India\n* Bret Giddings, University of Essex\n* Florian Ritterhoff, Munich University of Applied Sciences"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "If a DHCPv4 client sends a request with some specific options, and Kea fails to find an appropriate subnet for the client, the `kea-dhcp4` process will abort with an assertion failure.  This happens only if the client request is unicast directly to Kea; broadcast messages do not cause the problem.\nThis issue affects Kea versions 2.7.1 through 2.7.9, 3.0.0, and 3.1.0."
        }
      ],
      "exploits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "We are not aware of any active exploits."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Denial of service.  A malicious or misconfigured DHCP client can crash the Kea DHCPv4 service by sending a single packet."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-476",
              "description": "CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T20:23:29.489Z",
        "orgId": "404fd4d2-a609-4245-b543-2c944a302a22",
        "shortName": "isc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "CVE-2025-40779",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2025-40779"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Upgrade to the patched release most closely related to your current version of Kea: 3.0.1 or 3.1.1."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Kea crash upon interaction between specific client options and subnet selection",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "No workarounds known."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "404fd4d2-a609-4245-b543-2c944a302a22",
    "assignerShortName": "isc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-40779",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-27T20:23:29.489Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T08:44:49.857Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T14:08:05.935Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-40779\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-officer@isc.org\",\"published\":\"2025-08-27T21:15:54.960\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-08-29T16:24:09.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"If a DHCPv4 client sends a request with some specific options, and Kea fails to find an appropriate subnet for the client, the `kea-dhcp4` process will abort with an assertion failure.  This happens only if the client request is unicast directly to Kea; broadcast messages do not cause the problem.\\nThis issue affects Kea versions 2.7.1 through 2.7.9, 3.0.0, and 3.1.0.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Si un cliente DHCPv4 env\u00eda una solicitud con opciones espec\u00edficas y Kea no encuentra una subred adecuada para el cliente, el proceso `kea-dhcp4` se cancelar\u00e1 con un error de aserci\u00f3n. Esto solo ocurre si la solicitud del cliente se env\u00eda por unidifusi\u00f3n directamente a Kea; los mensajes de difusi\u00f3n no causan el problema. Este problema afecta a las versiones de Kea 2.7.1 a 2.7.9, 3.0.0 y 3.1.0.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-officer@isc.org\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-officer@isc.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-476\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2025-40779\",\"source\":\"security-officer@isc.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-40779\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-28T14:07:45.683079Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T14:08:00.526Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Kea crash upon interaction between specific client options and subnet selection\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"ISC would like to thank the following for bringing this vulnerability to our attention:\\n\\n* Jochen M.\\n* Martin Dinev, Trading212\\n* Ashwani Kumar, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education \u0026 Research, Chandigarh, India\\n* Bret Giddings, University of Essex\\n* Florian Ritterhoff, Munich University of Applied Sciences\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Denial of service.  A malicious or misconfigured DHCP client can crash the Kea DHCPv4 service by sending a single packet.\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"ISC\", \"product\": \"Kea\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"2.7.1\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2.7.9\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.1.0\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"2.6.0\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2.6.4\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"exploits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"We are not aware of any active exploits.\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to the patched release most closely related to your current version of Kea: 3.0.1 or 3.1.1.\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-08-27T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2025-40779\", \"name\": \"CVE-2025-40779\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"No workarounds known.\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"If a DHCPv4 client sends a request with some specific options, and Kea fails to find an appropriate subnet for the client, the `kea-dhcp4` process will abort with an assertion failure.  This happens only if the client request is unicast directly to Kea; broadcast messages do not cause the problem.\\nThis issue affects Kea versions 2.7.1 through 2.7.9, 3.0.0, and 3.1.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-476\", \"description\": \"CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"404fd4d2-a609-4245-b543-2c944a302a22\", \"shortName\": \"isc\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-27T20:23:29.489Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-40779\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-28T14:08:05.935Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-04-16T08:44:49.857Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"404fd4d2-a609-4245-b543-2c944a302a22\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-27T20:23:29.489Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"isc\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.