cve-2024-5991
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-27 18:33
Modified
2024-08-27 20:06
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
facts@wolfssl.com | https://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604 | Broken Link | |
nvd@nist.gov | https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604 | Issue Tracking, Patch |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "affected": [ { "cpes": [ "cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*" ], "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "wolfssl", "vendor": "wolfssl", "versions": [ { "lessThanOrEqual": "5.7.0", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-5991", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "yes" }, { "Technical Impact": "total" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-27T20:04:54.798411Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T20:06:24.558Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "wolfSSL", "vendor": "wolfSSL", "versions": [ { "lessThanOrEqual": "5.7.0", "status": "affected", "version": "0", "versionType": "release bundle" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "supportingMedia": [ { "base64": false, "type": "text/html", "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eIn function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0.\u003c/p\u003e" } ], "value": "In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0." } ], "impacts": [ { "capecId": "CAPEC-100", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers" } ] } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV4_0": { "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED", "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED", "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "NONE", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseScore": 10, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED", "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH", "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H", "version": "4.0", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH", "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED" }, "format": "CVSS", "scenarios": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "GENERAL" } ] } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-125", "description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T18:33:27.550Z", "orgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27", "shortName": "wolfSSL" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604" } ], "solutions": [ { "lang": "en", "supportingMedia": [ { "base64": false, "type": "text/html", "value": "Fixed in the following github pull request\u0026nbsp;\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604\"\u003ehttps://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604\u003c/a\u003e" } ], "value": "Fixed in the following github pull request\u00a0 https://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604" } ], "source": { "discovery": "EXTERNAL" }, "title": "Buffer overread in domain name matching", "x_generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "50d2cd11-d01a-48ed-9441-5bfce9d63b27", "assignerShortName": "wolfSSL", "cveId": "CVE-2024-5991", "datePublished": "2024-08-27T18:33:27.550Z", "dateReserved": "2024-06-13T21:54:51.320Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-27T20:06:24.558Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-5991\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"published\":\"2024-08-27T19:15:18.080\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-09-06T22:51:41.470\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En la funci\u00f3n MatchDomainName(), el par\u00e1metro de entrada str se trata como una cadena terminada en NULL a pesar de haber sido proporcionado por el usuario y no estar marcado. Espec\u00edficamente, la funci\u00f3n X509_check_host() toma un puntero y una longitud para verificar, sin requisitos de que termine en NULL. Si una persona que llama intentaba realizar una verificaci\u00f3n de nombre en un b\u00fafer terminado en NULL, el c\u00f3digo se le\u00eda m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de los l\u00edmites de la matriz de entrada hasta encontrar un terminador NULL. Este problema afecta a wolfSSL: hasta 5.7.0.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnerableSystemConfidentiality\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnerableSystemIntegrity\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnerableSystemAvailability\":\"HIGH\",\"subsequentSystemConfidentiality\":\"HIGH\",\"subsequentSystemIntegrity\":\"HIGH\",\"subsequentSystemAvailability\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemConfidentiality\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemIntegrity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnerableSystemAvailability\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemConfidentiality\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemIntegrity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubsequentSystemAvailability\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"5.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"68EDAD3E-B3D4-44BA-8F48-44DF39F1842C\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604\",\"source\":\"facts@wolfssl.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604\",\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.