cve-2024-46678
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-09-13 05:29
Modified
2024-12-19 09:20
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex
In the cited commit, bond->ipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,
hence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside
this lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,
"scheduling while atomic" will be triggered when changing bond's
active slave.
[ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200
[ 101.055726] Modules linked in:
[ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1
[ 101.058760] Hardware name:
[ 101.059434] Call Trace:
[ 101.059436] <TASK>
[ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60
[ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60
[ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0
[ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370
[ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0
[ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0
[ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
[ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10
[ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190
[ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90
[ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350
[ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]
[ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]
[ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]
[ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]
[ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]
[ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]
[ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]
[ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0
[ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400
[ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180
[ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0
[ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110
[ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
As bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called
from bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.
And bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state
xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user
context. So ipsec_lock doesn't have to be spin lock, change it to
mutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved.
References
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-46678", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-09-29T15:12:41.184590Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-09-29T15:12:56.353Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c", "include/net/bonding.h" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "6b598069164ac1bb60996d6ff94e7f9169dbd2d3", "status": "affected", "version": "9a5605505d9c7dbfdb89cc29a8f5fc5cf9fd2334", "versionType": "git" }, { "lessThan": "56354b0a2c24a7828eeed7de4b4dc9652d9affa3", "status": "affected", "version": "9a5605505d9c7dbfdb89cc29a8f5fc5cf9fd2334", "versionType": "git" }, { "lessThan": "2aeeef906d5a526dc60cf4af92eda69836c39b1f", "status": "affected", "version": "9a5605505d9c7dbfdb89cc29a8f5fc5cf9fd2334", "versionType": "git" } ] }, { "defaultStatus": "affected", "product": "Linux", "programFiles": [ "drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c", "include/net/bonding.h" ], "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "5.14" }, { "lessThan": "5.14", "status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.6.49", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.10.8", "versionType": "semver" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "6.11", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex\n\nIn the cited commit, bond-\u003eipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,\nhence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside\nthis lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,\n\"scheduling while atomic\" will be triggered when changing bond\u0027s\nactive slave.\n\n[ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200\n[ 101.055726] Modules linked in:\n[ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1\n[ 101.058760] Hardware name:\n[ 101.059434] Call Trace:\n[ 101.059436] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60\n[ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60\n[ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0\n[ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370\n[ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0\n[ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0\n[ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40\n[ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10\n[ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190\n[ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90\n[ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\n[ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350\n[ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]\n[ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]\n[ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]\n[ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]\n[ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]\n[ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]\n[ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\n[ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n[ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400\n[ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180\n[ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n[ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110\n[ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\n\nAs bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called\nfrom bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.\nAnd bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state\nxdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user\ncontext. So ipsec_lock doesn\u0027t have to be spin lock, change it to\nmutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved." } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T09:20:47.712Z", "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b598069164ac1bb60996d6ff94e7f9169dbd2d3" }, { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56354b0a2c24a7828eeed7de4b4dc9652d9affa3" }, { "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aeeef906d5a526dc60cf4af92eda69836c39b1f" } ], "title": "bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex", "x_generator": { "engine": "bippy-5f407fcff5a0" } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "assignerShortName": "Linux", "cveId": "CVE-2024-46678", "datePublished": "2024-09-13T05:29:12.835Z", "dateReserved": "2024-09-11T15:12:18.248Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T09:20:47.712Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-46678\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2024-09-13T06:15:12.450\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-09-23T14:44:12.880\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nbonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex\\n\\nIn the cited commit, bond-\u003eipsec_lock is added to protect ipsec_list,\\nhence xdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete are called inside\\nthis lock. As ipsec_lock is a spin lock and such xfrmdev ops may sleep,\\n\\\"scheduling while atomic\\\" will be triggered when changing bond\u0027s\\nactive slave.\\n\\n[ 101.055189] BUG: scheduling while atomic: bash/902/0x00000200\\n[ 101.055726] Modules linked in:\\n[ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4+ #1\\n[ 101.058760] Hardware name:\\n[ 101.059434] Call Trace:\\n[ 101.059436] \u003cTASK\u003e\\n[ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60\\n[ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60\\n[ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0\\n[ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370\\n[ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0\\n[ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0\\n[ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40\\n[ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10\\n[ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190\\n[ 101.064648] ? usleep_range_state+0x90/0x90\\n[ 101.065091] cmd_exec+0x437/0xb20 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.065569] mlx5_cmd_do+0x1e/0x40 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.066051] mlx5_cmd_exec+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.066552] mlx5_crypto_create_dek_key+0xea/0x120 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.067163] ? bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\\n[ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350\\n[ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core]\\n[ 101.069312] bond_change_active_slave+0x392/0x900 [bonding]\\n[ 101.069868] bond_option_active_slave_set+0x1c2/0x240 [bonding]\\n[ 101.070454] __bond_opt_set+0xa6/0x430 [bonding]\\n[ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [bonding]\\n[ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [bonding]\\n[ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [bonding]\\n[ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\\n[ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400\\n[ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180\\n[ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\\n[ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110\\n[ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53\\n\\nAs bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and bond_ipsec_del_sa_all are only called\\nfrom bond_change_active_slave, which requires holding the RTNL lock.\\nAnd bond_ipsec_add_sa and bond_ipsec_del_sa are xfrm state\\nxdo_dev_state_add and xdo_dev_state_delete APIs, which are in user\\ncontext. So ipsec_lock doesn\u0027t have to be spin lock, change it to\\nmutex, and thus the above issue can be resolved.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bonding: cambiar ipsec_lock de spin lock a mutex en el commit citado, se agrega bond-\u0026gt;ipsec_lock para proteger ipsec_list, por lo tanto, se llaman xdo_dev_state_add y xdo_dev_state_delete dentro de este bloqueo. Como ipsec_lock es un spin lock y tales operaciones xfrmdev pueden dormir, se activar\u00e1 \\\"programaci\u00f3n mientras es at\u00f3mica\\\" al cambiar el esclavo activo de bond. [ 101.055189] ERROR: programaci\u00f3n mientras es at\u00f3mica: bash/902/0x00000200 [ 101.055726] M\u00f3dulos vinculados en: [ 101.058211] CPU: 3 PID: 902 Comm: bash No contaminado 6.9.0-rc4+ #1 [ 101.058760] Nombre del hardware: [ 101.059434] Seguimiento de llamadas: [ 101.059436] [ 101.060873] dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 [ 101.061275] __schedule_bug+0x4e/0x60 [ 101.061682] __schedule+0x612/0x7c0 [ 101.062078] ? __mod_timer+0x25c/0x370 [ 101.062486] schedule+0x25/0xd0 [ 101.062845] schedule_timeout+0x77/0xf0 [ 101.063265] ? asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 [ 101.063724] ? __bpf_trace_itimer_state+0x10/0x10 [ 101.064215] __wait_for_common+0x87/0x190 [ 101.064648] ? opci\u00f3n_almacenamiento_sysfs_bonding+0x4d/0x80 [bonding] [ 101.067738] ? kmalloc_trace+0x4d/0x350 [ 101.068156] mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx+0x33/0x100 [mlx5_core] [ 101.068747] mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0x47b/0xaa0 [mlx5_core] [ 101.069312] cambio_enlace_esclavo_activo+0x392/0x900 [enlace] [ 101.069868] opci\u00f3n_enlace_esclavo_activo_conjunto+0x1c2/0x240 [enlace] [ 101.070454] __opci\u00f3n_enlace_conjunto+0xa6/0x430 [enlace] [ 101.070935] __bond_opt_set_notify+0x2f/0x90 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.071453] bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0x72/0xb0 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.071965] bonding_sysfs_store_option+0x4d/0x80 [vinculaci\u00f3n] [ 101.072567] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 [ 101.073033] vfs_write+0x2d8/0x400 [ 101.073416] ? alloc_fd+0x48/0x180 [ 101.073798] ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 [ 101.074175] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x110 [ 101.074576] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Como bond_ipsec_add_sa_all y bond_ipsec_del_sa_all solo se llaman desde bond_change_active_slave, que requiere mantener el bloqueo RTNL. Y bond_ipsec_add_sa y bond_ipsec_del_sa son API xdo_dev_state_add y xdo_dev_state_delete de estado xfrm, que est\u00e1n en el contexto del usuario. Por lo tanto, ipsec_lock no tiene que ser un bloqueo de giro; c\u00e1mbielo a mutex y, por lo tanto, se puede resolver el problema anterior.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-667\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"5.10.54\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"5.11\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E8C8B6A6-E5EE-4163-A155-8D5BFD1BBC4A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"5.13.6\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"5.14\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3FCF5994-AD9A-4278-8BF1-BC9274834795\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"5.14\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.6.49\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"03EC2AFC-5CDB-45F4-A071-83D36CE1569B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.7\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.10.8\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1B5D46C3-56A4-4380-9309-27BF73DF29A7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8B3CE743-2126-47A3-8B7C-822B502CF119\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4DEB27E7-30AA-45CC-8934-B89263EF3551\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0005AEF-856E-47EB-BFE4-90C46899394D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"39889A68-6D34-47A6-82FC-CD0BF23D6754\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B8383ABF-1457-401F-9B61-EE50F4C61F4F\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aeeef906d5a526dc60cf4af92eda69836c39b1f\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56354b0a2c24a7828eeed7de4b4dc9652d9affa3\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b598069164ac1bb60996d6ff94e7f9169dbd2d3\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.