cve-2024-42487
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-15 20:26
Modified
2024-08-15 20:46
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Cilium's Gateway API route matching order contradicts specification
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/a3510fe4a92305822aa1a5e08cb6d6c873c8699a | Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/34109 | Patch, Third Party Advisory | |
security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww | Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "metrics": [ { "other": { "content": { "id": "CVE-2024-42487", "options": [ { "Exploitation": "none" }, { "Automatable": "no" }, { "Technical Impact": "partial" } ], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2024-08-15T20:46:25.530673Z", "version": "2.0.3" }, "type": "ssvc" } } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-15T20:46:34.910Z", "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP" }, "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "cilium", "vendor": "cilium", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "= 1.16.0" }, { "status": "affected", "version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.8" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. In the 1.15 branch prior to 1.15.8 and the 1.16 branch prior to 1.16.1, Gateway API HTTPRoutes and GRPCRoutes do not follow the match precedence specified in the Gateway API specification. In particular, request headers are matched before request methods, when the specification describes that the request methods must be respected before headers are matched. This could result in unexpected behaviour with security This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.8 and v1.16.1. There is no workaround for this issue." } ], "metrics": [ { "cvssV3_1": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "CHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.1" } } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-113", "description": "CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Splitting\u0027)", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-15T20:26:53.455Z", "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M" }, "references": [ { "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww", "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww" }, { "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/34109", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/34109" }, { "name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/a3510fe4a92305822aa1a5e08cb6d6c873c8699a", "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/a3510fe4a92305822aa1a5e08cb6d6c873c8699a" } ], "source": { "advisory": "GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww", "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "Cilium\u0027s Gateway API route matching order contradicts specification" } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M", "cveId": "CVE-2024-42487", "datePublished": "2024-08-15T20:26:53.455Z", "dateReserved": "2024-08-02T14:13:04.617Z", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-15T20:46:34.910Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-42487\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-08-15T21:15:16.997\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-09-30T18:31:04.757\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. In the 1.15 branch prior to 1.15.8 and the 1.16 branch prior to 1.16.1, Gateway API HTTPRoutes and GRPCRoutes do not follow the match precedence specified in the Gateway API specification. In particular, request headers are matched before request methods, when the specification describes that the request methods must be respected before headers are matched. This could result in unexpected behaviour with security This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.8 and v1.16.1. There is no workaround for this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. En la rama 1.15 anterior a 1.15.8 y en la rama 1.16 anterior a 1.16.1, las HTTPRoutes y GRPCRoutes de la API de puerta de enlace no siguen la precedencia de coincidencia especificada en la especificaci\u00f3n de la API de puerta de enlace. En particular, los encabezados de solicitud coinciden antes que los m\u00e9todos de solicitud, cuando la especificaci\u00f3n describe que los m\u00e9todos de solicitud deben respetarse antes de que coincidan los encabezados. Esto podr\u00eda provocar un comportamiento inesperado con la seguridad. Este problema se solucion\u00f3 en Cilium v1.15.8 y v1.16.1. No existe ninguna soluci\u00f3n para este problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-113\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-436\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.15.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.15.8\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A0C8F90D-07B3-4666-8C22-089A2DA27A03\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:1.16.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DD19FEA3-61F3-4F12-8833-045918EEED05\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/commit/a3510fe4a92305822aa1a5e08cb6d6c873c8699a\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/34109\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.