cve-2024-28249
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-03-18 21:36
Modified
2024-08-02 00:48
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using IPsec and L7 policies
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-28249",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-19T14:34:32.978403Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T18:03:57.880Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.660Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.13.13"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, in Cilium clusters with IPsec enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies, IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There is no known workaround for this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-18T21:36:10.510Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using IPsec and L7 policies"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-28249",
"datePublished": "2024-03-18T21:36:10.510Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-03-07T14:33:30.036Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.660Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-28249\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2024-03-18T22:15:08.503\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T09:06:05.707\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, in Cilium clusters with IPsec enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies, IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There is no known workaround for this issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cilium es una soluci\u00f3n de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. Antes de las versiones 1.13.13, 1.14.8 y 1.15.2, en los cl\u00fasteres de Cilium con IPsec habilitado y el tr\u00e1fico que coincide con las pol\u00edticas de Capa 7, el tr\u00e1fico elegible para IPsec entre el proxy Envoy de un nodo y los pods en otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar y es elegible para IPsec. El tr\u00e1fico entre el proxy DNS de un nodo y los pods de otros nodos se env\u00eda sin cifrar. Este problema se resolvi\u00f3 en Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8 y 1.13.13. No se conoce ning\u00fan workaround para este problema.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.6,\"impactScore\":4.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-311\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.