CVE-2022-43563 (GCVE-0-2022-43563)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-11-04 22:19 – Updated: 2025-05-05 20:36
VLAI?
Title
Risky command safeguards bypass via rex search command field names in Splunk Enterprise
Summary
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Splunk Splunk Enterprise Affected: 8.1 , < 8.1.12 (custom)
Affected: 8.2 , < 8.2.9 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T13:32:59.588Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-43563",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-05-05T20:36:26.391813Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T20:36:39.876Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Splunk Enterprise",
          "vendor": "Splunk",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "8.1.12",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.2.9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.2",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2022-11-02T16:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards\"\u003eSPL safeguards for risky commands\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass  SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\n"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-11-04T22:19:55.669Z",
        "orgId": "42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469",
        "shortName": "Splunk"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "SVD-2022-1103",
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Risky command safeguards bypass via rex search command field names in Splunk Enterprise"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469",
    "assignerShortName": "Splunk",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-43563",
    "datePublished": "2022-11-04T22:19:55.669Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-10-20T18:37:09.181Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T20:36:39.876Z",
    "requesterUserId": "d03a2723-f9e2-46d2-8173-16ee7d33f715",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"8.1.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"8.1.12\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"697F9803-FC99-4149-A4E5-55A3A8CB1D18\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"8.2.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"8.2.9\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"07617B0C-3704-4DB5-B416-94B77A5C2EEE\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_cloud_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"9.0.2203\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"918AC184-EBFB-4715-BA0F-B848FA9503FF\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass  SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\\n\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"En las versiones de Splunk Enterprise inferiores a 8.2.9 y 8.1.12, la forma en que el comando de b\\u00fasqueda rex maneja los nombres de los campos permite a un atacante omitir las protecciones de SPL para comandos riesgosos https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/ Salvaguardias SPL. La vulnerabilidad requiere que el atacante realice phishing a la v\\u00edctima enga\\u00f1\\u00e1ndola para que inicie una solicitud dentro de su navegador. El atacante no puede explotar la vulnerabilidad a voluntad.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2022-43563",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:26:47.490",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"prodsec@splunk.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 5.2}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 5.9}]}",
      "published": "2022-11-04T23:15:09.887",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\", \"source\": \"prodsec@splunk.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "prodsec@splunk.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"prodsec@splunk.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-20\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-43563\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"prodsec@splunk.com\",\"published\":\"2022-11-04T23:15:09.887\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:26:47.490\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass  SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\\n\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En las versiones de Splunk Enterprise inferiores a 8.2.9 y 8.1.12, la forma en que el comando de b\u00fasqueda rex maneja los nombres de los campos permite a un atacante omitir las protecciones de SPL para comandos riesgosos https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/ Salvaguardias SPL. La vulnerabilidad requiere que el atacante realice phishing a la v\u00edctima enga\u00f1\u00e1ndola para que inicie una solicitud dentro de su navegador. El atacante no puede explotar la vulnerabilidad a voluntad.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"prodsec@splunk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.2},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"prodsec@splunk.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-20\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"8.1.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"8.1.12\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"697F9803-FC99-4149-A4E5-55A3A8CB1D18\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"8.2.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"8.2.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07617B0C-3704-4DB5-B416-94B77A5C2EEE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_cloud_platform:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"9.0.2203\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"918AC184-EBFB-4715-BA0F-B848FA9503FF\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\",\"source\":\"prodsec@splunk.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T13:32:59.588Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-43563\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-05-05T20:36:26.391813Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-05T20:36:34.490Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Risky command safeguards bypass via rex search command field names in Splunk Enterprise\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"SVD-2022-1103\", \"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Splunk\", \"product\": \"Splunk Enterprise\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.1\", \"lessThan\": \"8.1.12\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.2\", \"lessThan\": \"8.2.9\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2022-11-02T16:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.splunk.com/en_us/product-security/announcements/svd-2022-1103.html\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass  SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\\n\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003eIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\\\"_blank\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\" href=\\\"https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards\\\"\u003eSPL safeguards for risky commands\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003e. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-20\", \"description\": \"CWE-20 Improper Input Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469\", \"shortName\": \"Splunk\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2022-11-04T22:19:55.669Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-43563\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-05-05T20:36:39.876Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-10-20T18:37:09.181Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"42b59230-ec95-491e-8425-5a5befa1a469\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-11-04T22:19:55.669Z\", \"requesterUserId\": \"d03a2723-f9e2-46d2-8173-16ee7d33f715\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Splunk\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…