cve-2019-15894
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-10-07 15:54
Modified
2024-08-05 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x, 3.0.x through 3.0.9, 3.1.x through 3.1.6, 3.2.x through 3.2.3, and 3.3.x through 3.3.1. An attacker who uses fault injection to physically disrupt the ESP32 CPU can bypass the Secure Boot digest verification at startup, and boot unverified code from flash. The fault injection attack does not disable the Flash Encryption feature, so if the ESP32 is configured with the recommended combination of Secure Boot and Flash Encryption, then the impact is minimized. If the ESP32 is configured without Flash Encryption then successful fault injection allows arbitrary code execution. To protect devices with Flash Encryption and Secure Boot enabled against this attack, a firmware change must be made to permanently enable Flash Encryption in the field if it is not already permanently enabled.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a n/a Version: n/a
Show details on NVD website


{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-05T01:03:32.584Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "n/a",
               vendor: "n/a",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "n/a",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x, 3.0.x through 3.0.9, 3.1.x through 3.1.6, 3.2.x through 3.2.3, and 3.3.x through 3.3.1. An attacker who uses fault injection to physically disrupt the ESP32 CPU can bypass the Secure Boot digest verification at startup, and boot unverified code from flash. The fault injection attack does not disable the Flash Encryption feature, so if the ESP32 is configured with the recommended combination of Secure Boot and Flash Encryption, then the impact is minimized. If the ESP32 is configured without Flash Encryption then successful fault injection allows arbitrary code execution. To protect devices with Flash Encryption and Secure Boot enabled against this attack, a firmware change must be made to permanently enable Flash Encryption in the field if it is not already permanently enabled.",
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     description: "n/a",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "text",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2019-10-07T15:54:40",
            orgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
            shortName: "mitre",
         },
         references: [
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
               ],
               url: "https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot",
            },
         ],
         x_legacyV4Record: {
            CVE_data_meta: {
               ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org",
               ID: "CVE-2019-15894",
               STATE: "PUBLIC",
            },
            affects: {
               vendor: {
                  vendor_data: [
                     {
                        product: {
                           product_data: [
                              {
                                 product_name: "n/a",
                                 version: {
                                    version_data: [
                                       {
                                          version_value: "n/a",
                                       },
                                    ],
                                 },
                              },
                           ],
                        },
                        vendor_name: "n/a",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            },
            data_format: "MITRE",
            data_type: "CVE",
            data_version: "4.0",
            description: {
               description_data: [
                  {
                     lang: "eng",
                     value: "An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x, 3.0.x through 3.0.9, 3.1.x through 3.1.6, 3.2.x through 3.2.3, and 3.3.x through 3.3.1. An attacker who uses fault injection to physically disrupt the ESP32 CPU can bypass the Secure Boot digest verification at startup, and boot unverified code from flash. The fault injection attack does not disable the Flash Encryption feature, so if the ESP32 is configured with the recommended combination of Secure Boot and Flash Encryption, then the impact is minimized. If the ESP32 is configured without Flash Encryption then successful fault injection allows arbitrary code execution. To protect devices with Flash Encryption and Secure Boot enabled against this attack, a firmware change must be made to permanently enable Flash Encryption in the field if it is not already permanently enabled.",
                  },
               ],
            },
            problemtype: {
               problemtype_data: [
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "eng",
                           value: "n/a",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
               ],
            },
            references: {
               reference_data: [
                  {
                     name: "https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot",
                     refsource: "CONFIRM",
                     url: "https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
      assignerShortName: "mitre",
      cveId: "CVE-2019-15894",
      datePublished: "2019-10-07T15:54:40",
      dateReserved: "2019-09-03T00:00:00",
      dateUpdated: "2024-08-05T01:03:32.584Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-15894\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2019-10-07T16:15:11.413\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:29:40.990\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue was discovered in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.x, 3.0.x through 3.0.9, 3.1.x through 3.1.6, 3.2.x through 3.2.3, and 3.3.x through 3.3.1. An attacker who uses fault injection to physically disrupt the ESP32 CPU can bypass the Secure Boot digest verification at startup, and boot unverified code from flash. The fault injection attack does not disable the Flash Encryption feature, so if the ESP32 is configured with the recommended combination of Secure Boot and Flash Encryption, then the impact is minimized. If the ESP32 is configured without Flash Encryption then successful fault injection allows arbitrary code execution. To protect devices with Flash Encryption and Secure Boot enabled against this attack, a firmware change must be made to permanently enable Flash Encryption in the field if it is not already permanently enabled.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se detectó un problema en Espressif ESP-IDF versiones 2.x, versiones 3.0.x hasta 3.0.9, versiones 3.1.x hasta 3.1.6, versiones 3.2.x hasta 3.2.3 y versiones 3.3.x hasta 3.3.1. Un atacante que utiliza la inyección de un fallo para interrumpir físicamente la CPU ESP32 puede omitir la comprobación del resumen de Secure Boot en el inicio y arrancar el código no comprobado desde la memoria flash. El ataque de inyección de fallo no deshabilita la función de cifrado de la Flash, por lo que si la ESP32 está configurada con la combinación recomendada de Secure Boot y Flash Encryption, entonces el impacto es minimizado. Si el ESP32 está configurado sin Flash Encryption, entonces la inyección de fallo con éxito permite la ejecución de código arbitrario. Para proteger los dispositivos con Flash Encryption y Secure Boot habilitados contra este ataque, un cambio de firmware se debe realizar para habilitar permanentemente la Flash Encryption en el campo si aún no está habilitado permanentemente.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\",\"baseScore\":7.2,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"COMPLETE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":10.0,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-755\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp-idf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.0.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0B9C04BA-1FC0-49A5-B89F-16014DA3D48B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp-idf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartExcluding\":\"3.1\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.1.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"73B68B98-07BA-468B-B11B-0A76527F7419\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp-idf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartExcluding\":\"3.2\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.2.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"21A89350-58F6-4746-906C-54B36814AAB9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:espressif:esp-idf:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.3\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.3.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"29E03576-DD87-4AB7-9291-E23972A9C9E6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.espressif.com/en/news/Espressif_Security_Advisory_Concerning_Fault_Injection_and_Secure_Boot\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.