cve-2017-2629
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-07-27 19:00
Modified
2024-08-05 14:02
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server's certificate's validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there's valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn't support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server's certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status).
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T14:02:06.938Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "96382",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96382"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629"
},
{
"name": "1037871",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037871"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-201703-04",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201703-04"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "curl",
"vendor": "CURL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.53.0"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-02-22T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server\u0027s certificate\u0027s validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there\u0027s valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn\u0027t support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server\u0027s certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-07-28T09:57:01",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "96382",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96382"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629"
},
{
"name": "1037871",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_SECTRACK"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037871"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-201703-04",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_GENTOO"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201703-04"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2017-2629",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "curl",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "7.53.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "CURL"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server\u0027s certificate\u0027s validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there\u0027s valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn\u0027t support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server\u0027s certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status)."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": [
[
{
"vectorString": "4.3/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
]
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "96382",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96382"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629"
},
{
"name": "1037871",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037871"
},
{
"name": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09"
},
{
"name": "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-201703-04",
"refsource": "GENTOO",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201703-04"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-2629",
"datePublished": "2018-07-27T19:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2016-12-01T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T14:02:06.938Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-2629\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-07-27T19:29:00.440\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:23:52.010\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server\u0027s certificate\u0027s validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there\u0027s valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn\u0027t support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server\u0027s certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status).\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"curl en versiones anteriores a la 7.53.0 tiene una caracter\u00edstica de extensi\u00f3n TLS Certificate Status Request que solicita una nueva prueba de la validez del certificado del servidor en el c\u00f3digo que comprueba el \u00e9xito o el fracaso de una prueba. Acaba siempre pensando que hay pruebas v\u00e1lidas, incluso cuando no hay ninguna o si el servidor no soporta la extensi\u00f3n TLS en cuesti\u00f3n. Esto podr\u00eda llevar a que los usuarios no detecten cu\u00e1ndo el certificado de un servidor no es v\u00e1lido o que de otra manera se confunda que el servidor est\u00e1 en \\\"mejor forma\\\" de lo que est\u00e1 en realidad. Esta vulnerabilidad tambi\u00e9n existe en la herramienta de l\u00ednea de comandos (--cert-status).\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"SINGLE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:haxx:curl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"7.53.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8C79FEE1-2147-48CF-A4B7-862CC64321E9\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96382\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037871\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201703-04\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96382\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037871\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2629\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20170222.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201703-04\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.