CVE-2017-17847 (GCVE-0-2017-17847)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2017-12-22 23:00
Modified
2024-08-05 21:06
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-12-22T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-02-02T10:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-17847",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"
},
{
"name": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"
},
{
"name": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"
},
{
"name": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4070",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-17847",
"datePublished": "2017-12-22T23:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2017-12-22T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-17847\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-12-27T17:08:19.873\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha descubierto un problema en versiones anteriores a la 1.9.9 de Enigmail. Se puede dar una suplantaci\u00f3n de firma debido a que la interfaz de usuario no distingue correctamente entre una firma adjunta y una firma que aplica a todo el mensaje. Esto tambi\u00e9n se conoce como TBE-01-021. Esto se demuestra con un mensaje de correo electr\u00f3nico con un adjunto que es un mensaje de correo firmado en formato message/rfc822.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:enigmail:enigmail:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.9.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FB028A65-2C8A-4D9C-88F8-78BAE49E77C4\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…