cve-2010-3431
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2011-01-24 17:00
Modified
2024-08-07 03:11
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
The privilege-dropping implementation in the (1) pam_env and (2) pam_mail modules in Linux-PAM (aka pam) 1.1.2 does not check the return value of the setfsuid system call, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unintended uid, as demonstrated by a symlink attack on the .pam_environment file in a user's home directory. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-3435.
References
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-07T03:11:44.353Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20100927 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/5", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/3", }, { name: "GLSA-201206-31", tags: [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-31.xml", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20101004 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/03/1", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100924 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/9", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/8", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100928 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/10", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100927 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/4", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/10", }, { name: "49711", tags: [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/49711", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641361", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100928 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/7", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20101025 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/25/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/11", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { product: "n/a", vendor: "n/a", versions: [ { status: "affected", version: "n/a", }, ], }, ], datePublic: "2010-09-21T00:00:00", descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "The privilege-dropping implementation in the (1) pam_env and (2) pam_mail modules in Linux-PAM (aka pam) 1.1.2 does not check the return value of the setfsuid system call, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unintended uid, as demonstrated by a symlink attack on the .pam_environment file in a user's home directory. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-3435.", }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { description: "n/a", lang: "en", type: "text", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2012-07-24T09:00:00", orgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", shortName: "redhat", }, references: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20100927 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/5", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/3", }, { name: "GLSA-201206-31", tags: [ "vendor-advisory", "x_refsource_GENTOO", ], url: "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-31.xml", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20101004 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/03/1", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100924 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/9", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/8", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100928 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/10", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", ], url: "http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100927 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/4", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/10", }, { name: "49711", tags: [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/49711", }, { tags: [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", ], url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641361", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100928 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/7", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20101025 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/25/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20100921 Re: Minor security flaw with pam_xauth", tags: [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/11", }, ], }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", assignerShortName: "redhat", cveId: "CVE-2010-3431", datePublished: "2011-01-24T17:00:00", dateReserved: "2010-09-17T00:00:00", dateUpdated: "2024-08-07T03:11:44.353Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-3431\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2011-01-24T18:00:01.970\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:18:43.490\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The privilege-dropping implementation in the (1) pam_env and (2) pam_mail modules in Linux-PAM (aka pam) 1.1.2 does not check the return value of the setfsuid system call, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by leveraging an unintended uid, as demonstrated by a symlink attack on the .pam_environment file in a user's home directory. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-3435.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"La aplicación de escalada de privilegios en los modúlos (1) y (2) pam_mail de Linux-PAM (también conocido como pam) v1.1.2 no comprueba el valor devuelto de la llamada al sistema setfsuid, lo que podría permitir a usuarios locales obtener información sensible aprovechando un identificador de usuario no deseado, como lo demuestra un ataque de enlace simbólico en el archivo pam_environment en el directorio home del usuario. NOTA: esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2010-3435.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":1.9,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.4,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:linux-pam:linux-pam:1.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"56F68CBA-E64A-4085-8902-5EBF9A5349D6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/10\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/3\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/8\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/9\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/10\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/4\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/5\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/7\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/03/1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/25/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/49711\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-31.xml\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/11\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641361\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://git.altlinux.org/people/ldv/packages/?p=pam.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=843807a3a90f52e7538be756616510730a24739a\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/10\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/9\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/10\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/5\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/27/7\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/03/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/10/25/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/49711\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-31.xml\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/11\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/24/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641361\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}", }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.