cnvd - cnvd-2024-33450

cnvd-2024-33450

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在未明漏洞

Description:

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865是RFC开源的一个网络协议。

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在安全漏洞，攻击者利用该漏洞使用针对MD5响应验证器签名的选择前缀冲突攻击，将任何有效的响应(Access-Accept, Access-Reject或Access-Challenge)修改为任何其他响应。

Severity: 高

Formal description:

厂商尚未提供漏洞修补方案，请关注厂商主页及时更新： https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865

Reference: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4

Impacted products

Name
IETF RFC 2865

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2024-3596"
    }
  },
  "description": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u662fRFC\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u7f51\u7edc\u534f\u8bae\u3002\n\nRADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4f7f\u7528\u9488\u5bf9MD5\u54cd\u5e94\u9a8c\u8bc1\u5668\u7b7e\u540d\u7684\u9009\u62e9\u524d\u7f00\u51b2\u7a81\u653b\u51fb\uff0c\u5c06\u4efb\u4f55\u6709\u6548\u7684\u54cd\u5e94(Access-Accept, Access-Reject\u6216Access-Challenge)\u4fee\u6539\u4e3a\u4efb\u4f55\u5176\u4ed6\u54cd\u5e94\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u8865\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2024-33450",
  "openTime": "2024-07-23",
  "products": {
    "product": "IETF RFC 2865"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2024-07-23",
  "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2024-3596 (GCVE-0-2024-3596)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2024-07-09 12:02

Modified

2025-09-04 21:05

Severity ?

9.0 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWE

Summary

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/
	https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf
	https://www.blastradius.fail/
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
	https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014
	https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html	vendor-advisory
	https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html	vendor-advisory

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	IETF	RFC	Version: 2865

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:rfc:2865:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "rfc",
            "vendor": "ietf",
            "versions": [
              {
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "2865"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 9,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "CHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-3596",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-11T03:55:37.141738Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container",
        "x_generator": {
          "engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RFC",
          "vendor": "IETF",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2865"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Thanks to Sharon Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc Stevens, and Adam Suhl who researched and reported this vulnerability"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-09-03T17:29:16.788Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT for  SIPROTEC, SICAM and related product",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT to SCALANCE, RUGGEDCOM and related products.",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "VINCE 3.0.4",
        "env": "prod",
        "origin": "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2024-3596"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-3596",
    "datePublished": "2024-07-09T12:02:53.001Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-10T15:09:45.391Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted