cnvd - cnvd-2024-33450

cnvd-2024-33450

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在未明漏洞

Description

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865是RFC开源的一个网络协议。 RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在安全漏洞，攻击者利用该漏洞使用针对MD5响应验证器签名的选择前缀冲突攻击，将任何有效的响应(Access-Accept, Access-Reject或Access-Challenge)修改为任何其他响应。

Severity

高

Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修补方案，请关注厂商主页及时更新： https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865

Reference

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4

Impacted products

Name
IETF RFC 2865

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2024-3596"
    }
  },
  "description": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u662fRFC\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u7f51\u7edc\u534f\u8bae\u3002\n\nRADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4f7f\u7528\u9488\u5bf9MD5\u54cd\u5e94\u9a8c\u8bc1\u5668\u7b7e\u540d\u7684\u9009\u62e9\u524d\u7f00\u51b2\u7a81\u653b\u51fb\uff0c\u5c06\u4efb\u4f55\u6709\u6548\u7684\u54cd\u5e94(Access-Accept, Access-Reject\u6216Access-Challenge)\u4fee\u6539\u4e3a\u4efb\u4f55\u5176\u4ed6\u54cd\u5e94\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u8865\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2024-33450",
  "openTime": "2024-07-23",
  "products": {
    "product": "IETF RFC 2865"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2024-07-23",
  "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2024-3596 (GCVE-0-2024-3596)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2024-07-09 12:02

Modified

2025-09-04 21:05

Severity ?

9.0 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWE

Summary

RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.

References

URL

Tags

	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/
	https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf
	https://www.blastradius.fail/
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
	https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014
	https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html	vendor-advisory
	https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html	vendor-advisory

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	IETF	RFC	Version: 2865

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:rfc:2865:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "rfc",
            "vendor": "ietf",
            "versions": [
              {
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "2865"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 9,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "CHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-3596",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-07-11T03:55:37.141738Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T14:32:14.851Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container",
        "x_generator": {
          "engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "RFC",
          "vendor": "IETF",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2865"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Thanks to Sharon Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc Stevens, and Adam Suhl who researched and reported this vulnerability"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-09-03T17:29:16.788Z",
        "orgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
        "shortName": "certcc"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.blastradius.fail/"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT for  SIPROTEC, SICAM and related product",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "Siemens Security Advisory by Siemens ProductCERT to SCALANCE, RUGGEDCOM and related products.",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "VINCE 3.0.4",
        "env": "prod",
        "origin": "https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2024-3596"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "37e5125f-f79b-445b-8fad-9564f167944b",
    "assignerShortName": "certcc",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-3596",
    "datePublished": "2024-07-09T12:02:53.001Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-10T15:09:45.391Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T21:05:25.373Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.