cnvd-2018-03231
Vulnerability from cnvd
Title
Red Hat 389-ds-base身份验证绕过漏洞
Description
Red Hat 389-ds-base是美国红帽(Red Hat)公司的一个包括了Linux目录服务器和服务器管理命令行程序的软件包。
Red Hat 389-ds-base中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能正确的处理内部散列的对比操作。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞绕过身份验证进程。
Severity
中
VLAI Severity ?
Formal description
厂商尚未提供漏洞修复方案,请关注厂商主页更新: http://directory.fedoraproject.org
Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525628
https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102811
Impacted products
| Name | Red Hat 389-ds-base >=1.3.6.1,<=1.4.0.3 |
|---|
{
"bids": {
"bid": {
"bidNumber": "102811"
}
},
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2017-15135",
"cveUrl": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-15135"
}
},
"description": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u7ea2\u5e3d\uff08Red Hat\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u5305\u62ec\u4e86Linux\u76ee\u5f55\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u548c\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u7ba1\u7406\u547d\u4ee4\u884c\u7a0b\u5e8f\u7684\u8f6f\u4ef6\u5305\u3002\r\n\r\nRed Hat 389-ds-base\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u672a\u80fd\u6b63\u786e\u7684\u5904\u7406\u5185\u90e8\u6563\u5217\u7684\u5bf9\u6bd4\u64cd\u4f5c\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ed5\u8fc7\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u8fdb\u7a0b\u3002",
"discovererName": "Martin Poole",
"formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttp://directory.fedoraproject.org",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2018-03231",
"openTime": "2018-02-12",
"products": {
"product": "Red Hat 389-ds-base \u003e=1.3.6.1\uff0c\u003c=1.4.0.3"
},
"referenceLink": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525628\r\nhttps://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102811",
"serverity": "\u4e2d",
"submitTime": "2018-01-26",
"title": "Red Hat 389-ds-base\u8eab\u4efd\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…