cnvd-2017-32974
Vulnerability from cnvd
Title
Gemalto's HASP SRM内存破坏代码执行漏洞
Description
Gemalto是全球数字安全领域领导厂商,致力于金融IC卡、支付安全、移动支付解决方案、云认证访问服务、身份与隐私保护、电子医疗保健、电子政务等服务。 Gemalto's HASP SRM存在内存破坏漏洞，允许远程攻击者利用漏洞提交特殊的请求，可使应用程序崩溃或者执行任意代码。
Severity
高
Patch Name
Gemalto's HASP SRM内存破坏代码执行漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
Gemalto是全球数字安全领域领导厂商,致力于金融IC卡、支付安全、移动支付解决方案、云认证访问服务、身份与隐私保护、电子医疗保健、电子政务等服务。 Gemalto's HASP SRM存在内存破坏漏洞，允许远程攻击者利用漏洞提交特殊的请求，可使应用程序崩溃或者执行任意代码。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全补丁以修复该漏洞： https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/advisories/klcert-advisories/2017/10/02/klcert-17-007-sentinel-ldk-rte-memory-corruption-might-cause-remote-code-execution/

Reference
https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/advisories/klcert-advisories/2017/10/02/klcert-17-007-sentinel-ldk-rte-memory-corruption-might-cause-remote-code-execution/
Impacted products
Name
Gemalto Gemalto’s HASP SRM
Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2017-12821"
    }
  },
  "description": "Gemalto\u662f\u5168\u7403\u6570\u5b57\u5b89\u5168\u9886\u57df\u9886\u5bfc\u5382\u5546,\u81f4\u529b\u4e8e\u91d1\u878dIC\u5361\u3001\u652f\u4ed8\u5b89\u5168\u3001\u79fb\u52a8\u652f\u4ed8\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3001\u4e91\u8ba4\u8bc1\u8bbf\u95ee\u670d\u52a1\u3001\u8eab\u4efd\u4e0e\u9690\u79c1\u4fdd\u62a4\u3001\u7535\u5b50\u533b\u7597\u4fdd\u5065\u3001\u7535\u5b50\u653f\u52a1\u7b49\u670d\u52a1\u3002\r\n\r\nGemalto\u0027s HASP SRM\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u4ea4\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\uff0c\u53ef\u4f7f\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\u6216\u8005\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002",
  "discovererName": "unknwon",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttps://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/advisories/klcert-advisories/2017/10/02/klcert-17-007-sentinel-ldk-rte-memory-corruption-might-cause-remote-code-execution/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-32974",
  "openTime": "2017-11-07",
  "patchDescription": "Gemalto\u662f\u5168\u7403\u6570\u5b57\u5b89\u5168\u9886\u57df\u9886\u5bfc\u5382\u5546,\u81f4\u529b\u4e8e\u91d1\u878dIC\u5361\u3001\u652f\u4ed8\u5b89\u5168\u3001\u79fb\u52a8\u652f\u4ed8\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u3001\u4e91\u8ba4\u8bc1\u8bbf\u95ee\u670d\u52a1\u3001\u8eab\u4efd\u4e0e\u9690\u79c1\u4fdd\u62a4\u3001\u7535\u5b50\u533b\u7597\u4fdd\u5065\u3001\u7535\u5b50\u653f\u52a1\u7b49\u670d\u52a1\u3002\r\n\r\nGemalto\u0027s HASP SRM\u5b58\u5728\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u4ea4\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\uff0c\u53ef\u4f7f\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\u6216\u8005\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Gemalto\u0027s HASP SRM\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u4ee3\u7801\u6267\u884c\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "Gemalto Gemalto\u2019s HASP SRM"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/advisories/klcert-advisories/2017/10/02/klcert-17-007-sentinel-ldk-rte-memory-corruption-might-cause-remote-code-execution/",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2017-10-09",
  "title": "Gemalto\u0027s HASP SRM\u5185\u5b58\u7834\u574f\u4ee3\u7801\u6267\u884c\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.