cnvd - cnvd-2017-30865

cnvd-2017-30865

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: WolfSSL CyaSSL证书验证绕过漏洞

Description:

WolfSSL CyaSSL是美国WolfSSL公司的一个针对嵌入式系统开发人员使用的小的、可移植的嵌入式SSL编程库。

WolfSSL CyaSSL中存在证书验证绕过漏洞。远程攻击者可借助特制的服务器证书利用该漏洞欺骗服务器。

Severity: 中

Patch Name: WolfSSL CyaSSL证书验证绕过漏洞的补丁

Patch Description:

WolfSSL CyaSSL是美国WolfSSL公司的一个针对嵌入式系统开发人员使用的小的、可移植的嵌入式SSL编程库。

WolfSSL CyaSSL中存在证书验证绕过漏洞。远程攻击者可借助特制的服务器证书利用该漏洞欺骗服务器。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description:

目前厂商已发布升级补丁以修复漏洞，补丁获取链接： https://www.wolfssl.com/wolfssl-security-advisory-april-9-2014/

Reference: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2

Impacted products

Name
wolfSSL wolfSSL

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2014-2903"
    }
  },
  "description": "WolfSSL CyaSSL\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdWolfSSL\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u9488\u5bf9\u5d4c\u5165\u5f0f\u7cfb\u7edf\u5f00\u53d1\u4eba\u5458\u4f7f\u7528\u7684\u5c0f\u7684\u3001\u53ef\u79fb\u690d\u7684\u5d4c\u5165\u5f0fSSL\u7f16\u7a0b\u5e93\u3002\r\n\r\nWolfSSL CyaSSL\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8bc1\u4e66\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u7279\u5236\u7684\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8bc1\u4e66\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6b3a\u9a97\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002",
  "discovererName": "WolfSSL",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.wolfssl.com/wolfssl-security-advisory-april-9-2014/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2017-30865",
  "openTime": "2017-10-21",
  "patchDescription": "WolfSSL CyaSSL\u662f\u7f8e\u56fdWolfSSL\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u9488\u5bf9\u5d4c\u5165\u5f0f\u7cfb\u7edf\u5f00\u53d1\u4eba\u5458\u4f7f\u7528\u7684\u5c0f\u7684\u3001\u53ef\u79fb\u690d\u7684\u5d4c\u5165\u5f0fSSL\u7f16\u7a0b\u5e93\u3002\r\n\r\nWolfSSL CyaSSL\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8bc1\u4e66\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u501f\u52a9\u7279\u5236\u7684\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8bc1\u4e66\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6b3a\u9a97\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "WolfSSL CyaSSL\u8bc1\u4e66\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": "wolfSSL wolfSSL"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2017-10-17",
  "title": "WolfSSL CyaSSL\u8bc1\u4e66\u9a8c\u8bc1\u7ed5\u8fc7\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2014-2903 (GCVE-0-2014-2903)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2017-10-06 15:00

Modified

2024-08-06 10:28

Severity ?

CWE

Summary

CyaSSL does not check the key usage extension in leaf certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via a crafted server certificate not authorized for use in an SSL/TLS handshake.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	http://secunia.com/advisories/62604	third-party-advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T10:28:46.292Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "62604",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62604"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20140418 Re: CVE ids for CyaSSL 2.9.4?",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2014-04-17T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CyaSSL does not check the key usage extension in leaf certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via a crafted server certificate not authorized for use in an SSL/TLS handshake."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-10-06T14:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "62604",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62604"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20140418 Re: CVE ids for CyaSSL 2.9.4?",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2014-2903",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "CyaSSL does not check the key usage extension in leaf certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via a crafted server certificate not authorized for use in an SSL/TLS handshake."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "62604",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62604"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20140418 Re: CVE ids for CyaSSL 2.9.4?",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/2"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2014-2903",
    "datePublished": "2017-10-06T15:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2014-04-18T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T10:28:46.292Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted