CNVD-2016-10553
Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-11-03
VLAI
Title
ISC BIND 9存在DNAME拒绝服务漏洞
Description
BIND是一套开源的用于实现DNS协议的软件。
ISC BIND 9存在DNAME拒绝服务漏洞。当处理包含特制DNAME应答的递归响应包时，会导致目标解析器断言失败退出。攻击者利用漏洞可造成应用程序崩溃，导致拒绝服务攻击。
Severity
高
Patch Name
ISC BIND 9存在DNAME拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
BIND是一套开源的用于实现DNS协议的软件。
ISC BIND 9存在DNAME拒绝服务漏洞。当处理包含特制DNAME应答的递归响应包时，会导致目标解析器断言失败退出。攻击者利用漏洞可造成应用程序崩溃，导致拒绝服务攻击。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description
目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题，补丁获取链接： https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01434
Reference
http://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01434
http://securitytracker.com/id/1037156
Impacted products
| Name | ['ISC, Inc. BIND >=9.0.x，<=9.8.x', 'ISC, Inc. BIND >=9.9.0，<=9.9.9-P3', 'ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n>=9.9.3-S1，<=9.9.9-S5', 'ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n>=9.10.0，<=9.10.4-P3', 'ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n9.11.0'] |
|---|
{
"bids": {
"bid": {
"bidNumber": "94067"
}
},
"cves": {
"cve": {
"cveNumber": "CVE-2016-8864"
}
},
"description": "BIND\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u7528\u4e8e\u5b9e\u73b0DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002\r\n\r\nISC BIND 9\u5b58\u5728DNAME\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u5904\u7406\u5305\u542b\u7279\u5236DNAME\u5e94\u7b54\u7684\u9012\u5f52\u54cd\u5e94\u5305\u65f6\uff0c\u4f1a\u5bfc\u81f4\u76ee\u6807\u89e3\u6790\u5668\u65ad\u8a00\u5931\u8d25\u9000\u51fa\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u9020\u6210\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u653b\u51fb\u3002",
"discovererName": "Tony Finch (University of Cambridge), Marco Davids (SIDN Labs).",
"formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01434",
"isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
"number": "CNVD-2016-10553",
"openTime": "2016-11-03",
"patchDescription": "BIND\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u7528\u4e8e\u5b9e\u73b0DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002 \r\n\r\nISC BIND 9\u5b58\u5728DNAME\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u5f53\u5904\u7406\u5305\u542b\u7279\u5236DNAME\u5e94\u7b54\u7684\u9012\u5f52\u54cd\u5e94\u5305\u65f6\uff0c\u4f1a\u5bfc\u81f4\u76ee\u6807\u89e3\u6790\u5668\u65ad\u8a00\u5931\u8d25\u9000\u51fa\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u9020\u6210\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u5d29\u6e83\uff0c\u5bfc\u81f4\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u653b\u51fb\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
"patchName": "ISC BIND 9\u5b58\u5728DNAME\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
"products": {
"product": [
"ISC, Inc. BIND \u003e=9.0.x\uff0c\u003c=9.8.x",
"ISC, Inc. BIND \u003e=9.9.0\uff0c\u003c=9.9.9-P3",
"ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n\u003e=9.9.3-S1\uff0c\u003c=9.9.9-S5",
"ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n\u003e=9.10.0\uff0c\u003c=9.10.4-P3",
"ISC, Inc. BIND \r\n9.11.0"
]
},
"referenceLink": "http://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01434\r\nhttp://securitytracker.com/id/1037156",
"serverity": "\u9ad8",
"submitTime": "2016-11-02",
"title": "ISC BIND 9\u5b58\u5728DNAME\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…