cnvd-2016-01963
Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: NEC Aterm WG300HP跨站请求伪造漏洞

Description:

NEC Aterm WG300HP是日本电气(NEC)公司的一款无线路由器产品。

NEC Aterm WG300HP中存在跨站请求伪造漏洞。攻击者可利用该漏洞通过诱使登录用户浏览恶意网页执行未授权操作。

Severity:

Formal description:

目前厂商暂未发布修复措施解决此安全问题,建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商主页或参考网址以获取解决办法: http://jpn.nec.com/

Reference: https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN82020528/index.html http://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000036.html

Impacted products
Name
NEC WG300HP
Show details on source website


{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-1167"
    }
  },
  "description": "NEC Aterm WG300HP\u662f\u65e5\u672c\u7535\u6c14\uff08NEC\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u65e0\u7ebf\u8def\u7531\u5668\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\r\n\r\nNEC Aterm WG300HP\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u901a\u8fc7\u8bf1\u4f7f\u767b\u5f55\u7528\u6237\u6d4f\u89c8\u6076\u610f\u7f51\u9875\u6267\u884c\u672a\u6388\u6743\u64cd\u4f5c\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Toshitsugu Yoneyama of Mitsui Bussan",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u6682\u672a\u53d1\u5e03\u4fee\u590d\u63aa\u65bd\u89e3\u51b3\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u5efa\u8bae\u4f7f\u7528\u6b64\u8f6f\u4ef6\u7684\u7528\u6237\u968f\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u6216\u53c2\u8003\u7f51\u5740\u4ee5\u83b7\u53d6\u89e3\u51b3\u529e\u6cd5\uff1a\r\nhttp://jpn.nec.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-01963",
  "openTime": "2016-04-01",
  "products": {
    "product": "NEC WG300HP"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN82020528/index.html\r\nhttp://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000036.html",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2016-03-31",
  "title": "NEC Aterm WG300HP\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…