GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CNVD-2016-01549

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2016-03-10
VLAI
Title
ISC BIND rndc控制实例拒绝服务漏洞
Description
ISC BIND是一套实现了DNS协议的开源软件。 BIND rndc控制实例对请求输入处理存在设计缺陷,该漏洞可导致sexpr.c 或alist.c发生断言失败,最终导致在给named进程发送畸形数据包时,named进程退出(BIND可使用rndc工具来管理域名系统服务)。
Severity
Patch Name
ISC BIND rndc控制实例拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
ISC BIND是一套实现了DNS协议的开源软件。 BIND rndc控制实例对请求输入处理存在设计缺陷,该漏洞可导致sexpr.c 或alist.c发生断言失败,最终导致在给named进程发送畸形数据包时,named进程退出(BIND可使用rndc工具来管理域名系统服务)。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁修复该漏洞,请及时关注厂商主页升级修复: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01352

Reference
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01352
Impacted products
Name
['ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.0-9.10.3-P3', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.2.0-9.8.8', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.9.0-9.9.8-P3', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.9.3-S1-9.9.8-S5', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.0-9.10.3-P3']
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2016-1285"
    }
  },
  "description": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5b9e\u73b0\u4e86DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5f00\u6e90\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002 \r\n\r\nBIND rndc\u63a7\u5236\u5b9e\u4f8b\u5bf9\u8bf7\u6c42\u8f93\u5165\u5904\u7406\u5b58\u5728\u8bbe\u8ba1\u7f3a\u9677\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5bfc\u81f4sexpr.c \u6216alist.c\u53d1\u751f\u65ad\u8a00\u5931\u8d25\uff0c\u6700\u7ec8\u5bfc\u81f4\u5728\u7ed9named\u8fdb\u7a0b\u53d1\u9001\u7578\u5f62\u6570\u636e\u5305\u65f6\uff0cnamed\u8fdb\u7a0b\u9000\u51fa\uff08BIND\u53ef\u4f7f\u7528rndc\u5de5\u5177\u6765\u7ba1\u7406\u57df\u540d\u7cfb\u7edf\u670d\u52a1\uff09\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Michael McNally",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u5347\u7ea7\u4fee\u590d\uff1a\r\nhttps://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01352",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2016-01549",
  "openTime": "2016-03-10",
  "patchDescription": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u5957\u5b9e\u73b0\u4e86DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5f00\u6e90\u8f6f\u4ef6\u3002 \r\n\r\nBIND rndc\u63a7\u5236\u5b9e\u4f8b\u5bf9\u8bf7\u6c42\u8f93\u5165\u5904\u7406\u5b58\u5728\u8bbe\u8ba1\u7f3a\u9677\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u53ef\u5bfc\u81f4sexpr.c \u6216alist.c\u53d1\u751f\u65ad\u8a00\u5931\u8d25\uff0c\u6700\u7ec8\u5bfc\u81f4\u5728\u7ed9named\u8fdb\u7a0b\u53d1\u9001\u7578\u5f62\u6570\u636e\u5305\u65f6\uff0cnamed\u8fdb\u7a0b\u9000\u51fa\uff08BIND\u53ef\u4f7f\u7528rndc\u5de5\u5177\u6765\u7ba1\u7406\u57df\u540d\u7cfb\u7edf\u670d\u52a1\uff09\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "ISC BIND rndc\u63a7\u5236\u5b9e\u4f8b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.0-9.10.3-P3",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.2.0-9.8.8",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND  9.9.0-9.9.8-P3",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND  9.9.3-S1-9.9.8-S5",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND  9.10.0-9.10.3-P3"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01352",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2016-03-10",
  "title": "ISC BIND rndc\u63a7\u5236\u5b9e\u4f8b\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…