cnvd-2015-07241
Vulnerability from cnvd
Title: ARM PolarSSL和ARM mbed TLS堆缓冲区溢出漏洞
Description:
ARM mbed TLS(前称PolarSSL)是英国ARM公司的一款为mbed产品提供安全通讯和加密功能的产品。
ARM PolarSSL和ARM mbed TLS中存在基于堆的缓冲区溢出漏洞,该漏洞源于程序创建ClientHello消息时,没有对server name indication(SNI)扩展的主机名执行正确的边界检查。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞,造成拒绝服务(客户端崩溃),并执行任意代码。
Severity: 中
Patch Name: ARM PolarSSL和ARM mbed TLS堆缓冲区溢出漏洞的补丁
Patch Description:
ARM mbed TLS(前称PolarSSL)是英国ARM公司的一款为mbed产品提供安全通讯和加密功能的产品。 ARM PolarSSL和ARM mbed TLS中存在基于堆的缓冲区溢出漏洞,该漏洞源于程序创建ClientHello消息时,没有对server name indication(SNI)扩展的主机名执行正确的边界检查。远程攻击者可利用该漏洞,造成拒绝服务(客户端崩溃),并执行任意代码。目前,供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息,修复了此漏洞。
Formal description:
目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复此安全问题,补丁获取链接: https://tls.mbed.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2015-01
Reference: https://tls.mbed.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2015-01 https://guidovranken.wordpress.com/2015/10/07/cve-2015-5291/ http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169625.html
Name | ['ARM PolarSSL <=1.2.16', 'ARM mbed TLS <=1.3.13', 'ARM mbed TLS <=2.1.1'] |
---|
{ "cves": { "cve": { "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-5291" } }, "description": "ARM mbed TLS\uff08\u524d\u79f0PolarSSL\uff09\u662f\u82f1\u56fdARM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u4e3ambed\u4ea7\u54c1\u63d0\u4f9b\u5b89\u5168\u901a\u8baf\u548c\u52a0\u5bc6\u529f\u80fd\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\r\n\r\nARM PolarSSL\u548cARM mbed TLS\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u57fa\u4e8e\u5806\u7684\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u521b\u5efaClientHello\u6d88\u606f\u65f6\uff0c\u6ca1\u6709\u5bf9server name indication(SNI)\u6269\u5c55\u7684\u4e3b\u673a\u540d\u6267\u884c\u6b63\u786e\u7684\u8fb9\u754c\u68c0\u67e5\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\uff0c\u5e76\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002", "discovererName": "Manuel P\u00e9gouri\u00e9-Gonnard", "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u7ecf\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5347\u7ea7\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8865\u4e01\u83b7\u53d6\u94fe\u63a5\uff1a\r\nhttps://tls.mbed.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2015-01", "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e", "number": "CNVD-2015-07241", "openTime": "2015-11-05", "patchDescription": "ARM mbed TLS\uff08\u524d\u79f0PolarSSL\uff09\u662f\u82f1\u56fdARM\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u4e3ambed\u4ea7\u54c1\u63d0\u4f9b\u5b89\u5168\u901a\u8baf\u548c\u52a0\u5bc6\u529f\u80fd\u7684\u4ea7\u54c1\u3002\r\nARM PolarSSL\u548cARM mbed TLS\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u57fa\u4e8e\u5806\u7684\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u7a0b\u5e8f\u521b\u5efaClientHello\u6d88\u606f\u65f6\uff0c\u6ca1\u6709\u5bf9server name indication(SNI)\u6269\u5c55\u7684\u4e3b\u673a\u540d\u6267\u884c\u6b63\u786e\u7684\u8fb9\u754c\u68c0\u67e5\u3002\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\uff08\u5ba2\u6237\u7aef\u5d29\u6e83\uff09\uff0c\u5e76\u6267\u884c\u4efb\u610f\u4ee3\u7801\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002", "patchName": "ARM PolarSSL\u548cARM mbed TLS\u5806\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01", "products": { "product": [ "ARM PolarSSL \u003c=1.2.16", "ARM mbed TLS \u003c=1.3.13", "ARM mbed TLS \u003c=2.1.1" ] }, "referenceLink": "https://tls.mbed.org/tech-updates/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2015-01\r\nhttps://guidovranken.wordpress.com/2015/10/07/cve-2015-5291/\r\nhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/169625.html", "serverity": "\u4e2d", "submitTime": "2015-11-04", "title": "ARM PolarSSL\u548cARM mbed TLS\u5806\u7f13\u51b2\u533a\u6ea2\u51fa\u6f0f\u6d1e" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.