CNVD-2015-05893

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-09-09
VLAI
Title
BIND DNSSEC Key处理错误拒绝服务漏洞
Description
ISC BIND是一个应用非常广泛的DNS协议的实现,由ISC负责维护。 ISC BIND 'buffer.c'存在安全漏洞，允许远程用户发送特殊的查询，使远程Zone DNS服务器返回特殊的DNSSEC给目标校验解析器，触发该漏洞，使DNS服务崩溃。
Severity
高
Patch Name
BIND DNSSEC Key处理错误拒绝服务漏洞的补丁
Patch Description
ISC BIND是一个应用非常广泛的DNS协议的实现,由ISC负责维护。ISC BIND 'buffer.c'存在安全漏洞，允许远程用户发送特殊的查询，使远程Zone DNS服务器返回特殊的DNSSEC给目标校验解析器，触发该漏洞，使DNS服务崩溃。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。
Formal description

用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全公告获取补丁以修复该漏洞： https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html

Reference
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html
Impacted products
Name
['ISC, Inc. BIND 9.x(<9.9.7-P3)', 'ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.x(<9.10.2-P4)']
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2015-5722"
    }
  },
  "description": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5e94\u7528\u975e\u5e38\u5e7f\u6cdb\u7684DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5b9e\u73b0,\u7531ISC\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u3002\r\n\r\nISC BIND \u0027buffer.c\u0027\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u7528\u6237\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u4f7f\u8fdc\u7a0bZone DNS\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8fd4\u56de\u7279\u6b8a\u7684DNSSEC\u7ed9\u76ee\u6807\u6821\u9a8c\u89e3\u6790\u5668\uff0c\u89e6\u53d1\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7fDNS\u670d\u52a1\u5d29\u6e83\u3002",
  "discovererName": "Michael McNally",
  "formalWay": "\u7528\u6237\u53ef\u53c2\u8003\u5982\u4e0b\u5382\u5546\u63d0\u4f9b\u7684\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u83b7\u53d6\u8865\u4e01\u4ee5\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff1a\r\nhttps://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-05893",
  "openTime": "2015-09-09",
  "patchDescription": "ISC BIND\u662f\u4e00\u4e2a\u5e94\u7528\u975e\u5e38\u5e7f\u6cdb\u7684DNS\u534f\u8bae\u7684\u5b9e\u73b0,\u7531ISC\u8d1f\u8d23\u7ef4\u62a4\u3002ISC BIND \u0027buffer.c\u0027\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u7528\u6237\u53d1\u9001\u7279\u6b8a\u7684\u67e5\u8be2\uff0c\u4f7f\u8fdc\u7a0bZone DNS\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u8fd4\u56de\u7279\u6b8a\u7684DNSSEC\u7ed9\u76ee\u6807\u6821\u9a8c\u89e3\u6790\u5668\uff0c\u89e6\u53d1\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u4f7fDNS\u670d\u52a1\u5d29\u6e83\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "BIND DNSSEC Key\u5904\u7406\u9519\u8bef\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.x(\u003c9.9.7-P3)",
      "ISC, Inc. BIND 9.10.x(\u003c9.10.2-P4)"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01287/74/CVE-2015-5722%3A-Parsing-malformed-keys-may-cause-BIND-to-exit-due-to-a-failed-assertion-in-buffer.c.html",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2015-09-06",
  "title": "BIND DNSSEC Key\u5904\u7406\u9519\u8bef\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.