GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CERTA-2011-AVI-132

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Plusieurs vulnérabilités dans syslog-ng permettent à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance ou de contourner la politique de sécurité.

Description

Plusieurs vulnérabilités sont présentes dans syslog-ng Premium Edition :

  • des débordements d'entiers dans la version utilisée de la bibliothèque GLib permettent à un utilisateur malveillant d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance ;
  • des erreurs dans la version utilisée de la bibliothèque OpenSSL permettent à un utilisateur malveillant de contourner la politique de sécurité.

Solution

Les versions 3.0.7a, 3.2.1b et 4.0.1a de syslog-ng Premium Edition corrigent ces problèmes.

Se référer aux bulletins de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

syslog-ng Premium Edition 3.0.x, 3.2.x et 4.0.x.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003esyslog-ng Premium Edition 3.0.x, 3.2.x  et 4.0.x.\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nPlusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s sont pr\u00e9sentes dans syslog-ng Premium Edition\u00a0:\n\n-   des d\u00e9bordements d\u0027entiers dans la version utilis\u00e9e de la\n    biblioth\u00e8que GLib permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter\n    du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance\u00a0;\n-   des erreurs dans la version utilis\u00e9e de la biblioth\u00e8que OpenSSL\n    permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant de contourner la politique\n    de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n\n## Solution\n\nLes versions 3.0.7a, 3.2.1b et 4.0.1a de syslog-ng Premium Edition\ncorrigent ces probl\u00e8mes.\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer aux bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-7270",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-7270"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2009-3555",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3555"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-4316",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4316"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2010-4180",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-4180"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2011-AVI-132",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2011-03-04T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans syslog-ng permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur\nmalveillant d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire \u00e0 distance ou de contourner la\npolitique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans syslog-ng",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Annonces des versions de syslog-ng du 24 f\u00e9vrier 2011",
      "url": "https://lists.balabit.com/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-February/000111.html"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.