CERTA-2004-AVI-043

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité dans Metamail permet à un utilisateur mal intentionné, envoyant un message électronique habilement constitué, d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Description

Metamail est un système de traitement des messages électroniques multimedia. Plusieurs vulnérabilités permettent à un utilisateur mal intentionné, au moyen d'un message électronique malicieux, d'exécuter du code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

Se référer à la section Documentation pour la mise à jour selon la plate-forme concernée.

Metamail versions 2.7 et versions antérieures.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cTT\u003eMetamail\u003c/TT\u003e versions 2.7 et  versions ant\u00e9rieures.",
  "content": "## Description\n\nMetamail est un syst\u00e8me de traitement des messages \u00e9lectroniques\nmultimedia. Plusieurs vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur mal\nintentionn\u00e9, au moyen d\u0027un message \u00e9lectronique malicieux, d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du\ncode arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0 la section Documentation pour la mise \u00e0 jour selon la\nplate-forme concern\u00e9e.\n",
  "cves": [],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA-449-1 :",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-449"
    },
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 FreeBSD du 18 f\u00e9rvier 2004 :",
      "url": "http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/"
    },
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA 200405-17 :",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-17.xml"
    },
    {
      "title": "Mise \u00e0 jour de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du paquetage NetBSD metamail :",
      "url": "ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/distfiles/vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandrake MDKSA-2004:014 :",
      "url": "http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2004:014"
    },
    {
      "title": "Site internet de Metamail :",
      "url": "http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/~trey/emacs/metamail.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2004-AVI-043",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2004-02-19T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "premi\u00e8re r\u00e9vision : ajout de la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 l\u0027avis Debian.",
      "revision_date": "2004-02-25T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "ajout des r\u00e9f\u00e9rences aux bulletins de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 FreeBSD et NetBSD.",
      "revision_date": "2004-05-13T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "ajout de la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo.",
      "revision_date": "2004-05-24T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Metamail permet \u00e0 un utilisateur mal intentionn\u00e9,\nenvoyant un message \u00e9lectronique habilement constitu\u00e9, d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du\ncode arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de Metamail",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2004:073",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-073.html"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…