Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:57
Modified
2025-04-03 14:40
Summary
Details

Lua 5.4.0 (fixed in 5.4.1) has a segmentation fault in changedline in ldebug.c (e.g., when called by luaG_traceexec) because it incorrectly expects that an oldpc value is always updated upon a return of the flow of control to a function.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Bitnami",
        "name": "lua",
        "purl": "pkg:bitnami/lua"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.3.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15945"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cpes": [
      "cpe:2.3:a:lua:lua:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
    ],
    "severity": "Medium"
  },
  "details": "Lua 5.4.0 (fixed in 5.4.1) has a segmentation fault in changedline in ldebug.c (e.g., when called by luaG_traceexec) because it incorrectly expects that an oldpc value is always updated upon a return of the flow of control to a function.",
  "id": "BIT-lua-2020-15945",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T14:40:37.652Z",
  "published": "2024-03-06T10:57:19.502Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2020-07/msg00123.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lua/lua/commit/a2195644d89812e5b157ce7bac35543e06db05e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.lua.org/bugs.html#5.4.0-8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15945"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.5.0"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…