GHSA-xvjm-fvxx-q3hv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-05-21 14:26
Modified
2024-11-13 15:59
Severity ?
2.5 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
2.0 (Low) - CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
CHECK-fail due to integer overflow
Details

Impact

An attacker can trigger a denial of service via a CHECK-fail in caused by an integer overflow in constructing a new tensor shape:

```python import tensorflow as tf

input_layer = 2**60-1 sparse_data = tf.raw_ops.SparseSplit( split_dim=1, indices=[(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (4, 3), (5, 0), (5, 1)], values=[1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0], shape=(input_layer, input_layer), num_split=2, name=None ) ```

This is because the implementation builds a dense shape without checking that the dimensions would not result in overflow:

cc sparse::SparseTensor sparse_tensor; OP_REQUIRES_OK(context, sparse::SparseTensor::Create( input_indices, input_values, TensorShape(input_shape.vec<int64>()), &sparse_tensor));

The TensorShape constructor uses a CHECK operation which triggers when InitDims returns a non-OK status.

cc template <class Shape> TensorShapeBase<Shape>::TensorShapeBase(gtl::ArraySlice<int64> dim_sizes) { set_tag(REP16); set_data_type(DT_INVALID); TF_CHECK_OK(InitDims(dim_sizes)); }

In our scenario, this occurs when adding a dimension from the argument results in overflow:

```cc template Status TensorShapeBase::InitDims(gtl::ArraySlice dim_sizes) { ... Status status = Status::OK(); for (int64 s : dim_sizes) { status.Update(AddDimWithStatus(internal::SubtleMustCopy(s))); if (!status.ok()) { return status; } } }

template Status TensorShapeBase::AddDimWithStatus(int64 size) { ... int64 new_num_elements; if (kIsPartial && (num_elements() < 0 || size < 0)) { new_num_elements = -1; } else { new_num_elements = MultiplyWithoutOverflow(num_elements(), size); if (TF_PREDICT_FALSE(new_num_elements < 0)) { return errors::Internal("Encountered overflow when multiplying ", num_elements(), " with ", size, ", result: ", new_num_elements); } } ... } ```

This is a legacy implementation of the constructor and operations should use BuildTensorShapeBase or AddDimWithStatus to prevent CHECK-failures in the presence of overflows.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 4c0ee937c0f61c4fc5f5d32d9bb4c67428012a60.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by researchers from University of Virginia and University of California, Santa Barbara.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-cpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-cpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-cpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-cpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "tensorflow-gpu"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.4.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-29584"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-18T17:23:38Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-14T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nAn attacker can trigger a denial of service via a `CHECK`-fail in  caused by an integer overflow in constructing a new tensor shape:\n\n```python\nimport tensorflow as tf\n\ninput_layer = 2**60-1\nsparse_data = tf.raw_ops.SparseSplit(\n    split_dim=1, \n    indices=[(0, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), \n    (4, 3), (5, 0), (5, 1)],\n    values=[1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0],\n    shape=(input_layer, input_layer),\n    num_split=2,\n    name=None\n    )\n```\n  \nThis is because the [implementation](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/0908c2f2397c099338b901b067f6495a5b96760b/tensorflow/core/kernels/sparse_split_op.cc#L66-L70) builds a dense shape without checking that the dimensions would not result in overflow:\n\n```cc\nsparse::SparseTensor sparse_tensor;\nOP_REQUIRES_OK(context,\n               sparse::SparseTensor::Create(\n                 input_indices, input_values,\n                 TensorShape(input_shape.vec\u003cint64\u003e()), \u0026sparse_tensor));\n```\n\nThe [`TensorShape` constructor](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/6f9896890c4c703ae0a0845394086e2e1e523299/tensorflow/core/framework/tensor_shape.cc#L183-L188) uses a `CHECK` operation which triggers when [`InitDims`](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/6f9896890c4c703ae0a0845394086e2e1e523299/tensorflow/core/framework/tensor_shape.cc#L212-L296) returns a non-OK status.\n                    \n```cc               \ntemplate \u003cclass Shape\u003e\nTensorShapeBase\u003cShape\u003e::TensorShapeBase(gtl::ArraySlice\u003cint64\u003e dim_sizes) {\n  set_tag(REP16);\n  set_data_type(DT_INVALID);\n  TF_CHECK_OK(InitDims(dim_sizes));\n}\n```\n\nIn our scenario, this occurs when adding a dimension from the argument results in overflow:\n\n```cc\ntemplate \u003cclass Shape\u003e\nStatus TensorShapeBase\u003cShape\u003e::InitDims(gtl::ArraySlice\u003cint64\u003e dim_sizes) {\n  ...\n  Status status = Status::OK();\n  for (int64 s : dim_sizes) {\n    status.Update(AddDimWithStatus(internal::SubtleMustCopy(s)));\n    if (!status.ok()) {\n      return status;\n    }\n  }\n}\n\ntemplate \u003cclass Shape\u003e\nStatus TensorShapeBase\u003cShape\u003e::AddDimWithStatus(int64 size) {\n  ...\n  int64 new_num_elements;\n  if (kIsPartial \u0026\u0026 (num_elements() \u003c 0 || size \u003c 0)) {\n    new_num_elements = -1;\n  } else {\n    new_num_elements = MultiplyWithoutOverflow(num_elements(), size);\n    if (TF_PREDICT_FALSE(new_num_elements \u003c 0)) {\n        return errors::Internal(\"Encountered overflow when multiplying \",\n                                num_elements(), \" with \", size,\n                                \", result: \", new_num_elements);\n      }\n  }\n  ...\n}\n```\n\nThis is a legacy implementation of the constructor and operations should use `BuildTensorShapeBase` or `AddDimWithStatus` to prevent `CHECK`-failures in the presence of overflows.\n\n### Patches\nWe have patched the issue in GitHub commit [4c0ee937c0f61c4fc5f5d32d9bb4c67428012a60](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/4c0ee937c0f61c4fc5f5d32d9bb4c67428012a60).\n\nThe fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.\n\n### For more information\nPlease consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.\n\n### Attribution\nThis vulnerability has been reported by researchers from University of Virginia and University of California, Santa Barbara.",
  "id": "GHSA-xvjm-fvxx-q3hv",
  "modified": "2024-11-13T15:59:44Z",
  "published": "2021-05-21T14:26:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-xvjm-fvxx-q3hv"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29584"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/4c0ee937c0f61c4fc5f5d32d9bb4c67428012a60"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-cpu/PYSEC-2021-512.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-gpu/PYSEC-2021-710.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow/PYSEC-2021-221.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "CHECK-fail due to integer overflow"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.