GHSA-wgmx-52ph-qqcw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-10-10 16:05
Modified
2024-10-16 20:50
Severity ?
Summary
Qutebrowser CSRF Vulnerability
Details
qutebrowser before version 1.4.1 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery flaw that allows websites to access qute://*
URLs. A malicious website could exploit this to load a qute://settings/set
URL, which then sets editor.command
to a bash script, resulting in arbitrary code execution.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "qutebrowser", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "1.4.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-10895", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-352", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2020-06-16T22:00:28Z", nvd_published_at: null, severity: "HIGH", }, details: "qutebrowser before version 1.4.1 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery flaw that allows websites to access `qute://*` URLs. A malicious website could exploit this to load a `qute://settings/set` URL, which then sets `editor.command` to a bash script, resulting in arbitrary code execution.", id: "GHSA-wgmx-52ph-qqcw", modified: "2024-10-16T20:50:08Z", published: "2018-10-10T16:05:23Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10895", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/commit/43e58ac865ff862c2008c510fc5f7627e10b4660", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10895", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/qutebrowser/PYSEC-2018-27.yaml", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/07/11/7", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Qutebrowser CSRF Vulnerability", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.